2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1927874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Non-Executive Directors and Institutional Shareholders Influence Firm Performance? Evidence from UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GMM was preferred for analysis because it is able to control any potential issues of endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and autocorrelation that may arise due to time-invariant variables like directors' remuneration and board size. According to Sheikh et al (2018) and Haron (2018), GMM is capable of addressing issues such as endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and autocorrelation that, when not checked, result in spurious regression outcomes. The software used in this research was STATA 16.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMM was preferred for analysis because it is able to control any potential issues of endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and autocorrelation that may arise due to time-invariant variables like directors' remuneration and board size. According to Sheikh et al (2018) and Haron (2018), GMM is capable of addressing issues such as endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and autocorrelation that, when not checked, result in spurious regression outcomes. The software used in this research was STATA 16.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%