2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do organizations adopt sophisticated capital budgeting practices to deal with uncertainty in the investment decision?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
121
2
34

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
121
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…We also have to admit that we cannot ultimately predict the potential acceptance of our approach in corporate practice. However, as demonstrated in Verbeeten's (2006) study, highly uncertain environments increase firms' willingness to adopt more sophisticated capital budgeting practices. As R&D is typically associated with high levels of uncertainty, we think that implementing our approach is most likely in R&D management (also see Hartmann and Hassan 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We also have to admit that we cannot ultimately predict the potential acceptance of our approach in corporate practice. However, as demonstrated in Verbeeten's (2006) study, highly uncertain environments increase firms' willingness to adopt more sophisticated capital budgeting practices. As R&D is typically associated with high levels of uncertainty, we think that implementing our approach is most likely in R&D management (also see Hartmann and Hassan 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A significant proportion of this literature has focused on the extent to which decision makers' intuition is consistent with real-option theory (Busby & Pitts, 1997;Howell & Jägle, 1997;Remer, Ang & Baden-Fuller, 2001;Verbeeten, 2006) and there is general agreement that biotechnology/pharmaceuticals firms' market value can be considered as the value of a basket of real options on their R&D portfolio (Ely et al, 2003;Woerner & Grupp, 2003;Hartman & Hassan, 2006). A theme is this literature is a call for better educated decision makers to realise the benefits of the real-options approach for investment appraisal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is generally accepted that the application of real-options as an investment appraisal technique has been limited due to its complexity and because the evidence examining the association between decision-makers' intuition and real-option theory is mixed (Busby & Pitts, 1997;Howell & Jägle, 1997;Remer, Ang & Baden-Fuller, 2001;Verbeeten, 2006). While it is evident that there is considerable variation in the application and understanding of real-options generally, the biotechnology/pharmaceuticals sector is 16 often cited as an industry where real options analysis is applicable and where firms' market value can be considered as the value of a basket of real options on their R&D portfolio (Ely et al, 2003;Woerner & Grupp, 2003;Hartman & Hassan, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if qualitative criteria is incorporated in the SID, there is a lack of structured and validated methodologies [23], [24]. However, scientists argue that an organization's philosophy itself and organizational context vary across circumstantial settings [25], [26].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%