2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do outcome or input risks limit adoption of environmental projects: Rehabilitating gullies in Great Barrier Reef catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 2)). We expect that due to the novelty of the program, especially farmers' (potentially heterogeneous) expectations concerning yield effects and production risks of the pesticide-free production system will play an important role in adoption (Lequin et al, 2019;Pannell, 2003;Reimer et al, 2012;Star et al, 2019). Farmers' experiences with pesticide-free production and their risk preferences are expected to influence how these uncertainties are weighed in the farmers' decisions (Serra et al, 2008).…”
Section: Iii) Farmers' Perceptions and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2)). We expect that due to the novelty of the program, especially farmers' (potentially heterogeneous) expectations concerning yield effects and production risks of the pesticide-free production system will play an important role in adoption (Lequin et al, 2019;Pannell, 2003;Reimer et al, 2012;Star et al, 2019). Farmers' experiences with pesticide-free production and their risk preferences are expected to influence how these uncertainties are weighed in the farmers' decisions (Serra et al, 2008).…”
Section: Iii) Farmers' Perceptions and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that farmers care not only about the economic incentives of the contracts but also of their "reputation" (Villamayor-Tomas et al, 2019), which can be tested through attributes exhibiting neighbor-effect. 'Risk' is another prescription attribute that has only been used in one study (in Star et al, 2019). Though many other AES studies talk about farmers' perceptions of risk and uncertainty as core reasons for non-participation (e.g., Hellerstein et al, 2015;Schilizzi & Latacz-Lohmann, 2016;Whitten et al, 2013;etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Risk' is another attribute that has been used in the study by Star et al (2019) that explored how input or outcome risk limits the farmers' willingness to implement environmental measures. Their study reported that higher levels of either risk would reduce participation Nidhi Raina et al and increase the compensation amount.…”
Section: Prescription Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rolfe (2016, 2018) used experiments with beef producers in GBR catchments to demonstrate that there is substantial myopia about the effect of their grazing decisions on resource (land) condition. The results of Rolfe and Gregg (2015) and Gregg and Rolfe (2017) also demonstrate that risk factors are important reasons why beef producers in GBR catchments are slow to change their management practices, whereas Star et al (2019) identify that risk factors may limit engagement with government schemes and agencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%