1996
DOI: 10.2307/2111635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Parties Make a Difference? A Reappraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be in line with past work, including, e.g. Blais et al (1996) and Soroka and Wlezien (2004). 29.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would be in line with past work, including, e.g. Blais et al (1996) and Soroka and Wlezien (2004). 29.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consider findings in other work exploring the impact of partisanship with more data, e.g. Blais et al (1996). 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, higher public expenditures under leftist governments were reported by e.g. Blais et al (1993Blais et al ( , 1996 and Cusack (1997) for panels of OECD countries. But overall, previous research does not provide consistent empirical evidence that leftist governments increased public spending.…”
Section: The Parties-do-matter-hypothesismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Partisan theory, for example, suggests that leftwing governments implement more expansionary policies and favor more government intervention than rightwing governments-although the empirical evidence is mixed and whether party ideology mattered depends on the policy field and time period. For example, higher public expenditures under leftist governments were reported by Blais et al (1993Blais et al ( , 1996 for panels of OECD countries. Yet there is no conclusive empirical evidence that leftist governments in fact spent more.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%