Do Patents Spur Innovation for Society? Lessons from 3D Printing

Abstract

Effective appropriation of new technology has long been considered essential for innovation. Yet, the role of patents and other Intellectual Property tools has been questioned, both for rewarding innovators and serving societal needs. Simultaneously, there is ample empirical evidence of technological advance accelerating under conditions of loose appropriability, for example, when patents expire and cases of innovations based on shared technology and diverse motivations. This paper explores the case of the 3D printing technology, which appears to have found successful commercialization and dynamic market growth after key patents expired. We analyze the role of commons-based peer production practices in forging synergies among different factors and effectuating an alternative innovation pathway and the challenges and contradictions in the process. Finally, we critically assess recent developments of 3D printing technology and draw lessons for innovation policy by incorporating aspects of emerging commons-based innovation paradigms.

Tracing sustainable production from a degrowth and localisation perspective: A case of 3D printers

“…We examined 3D printers that differ in how they are produced, allowing for different levels of openness and localised manufacturing. To allow for a tentative comparative assessment, we focused on desktop 3D printers, and particularly the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technology, one the most widely used and commercialised 3D printing applications (Pazaitis et al, 2021).…”

“…We focus on a technological artefact that has been presented as an exemplar of DGML production, i.e. 3D printers (Kostakis et al, 2018;Pazaitis et al, 2021). Similarly, several degrowth scholars and localisation enthusiasts (Kerschner et al, 2018;Molitch-Hou, 2020) have argued for the potential of 3D printers to reduce the environmental impact of the contemporary industrial world, fostering decentralised manufacturing processes and local supply chains.…”