Do patient-reported outcome measures measure up? A qualitative study to examine perceptions and experiences with heart failure proms among diverse, low-income patients

Abstract

Background The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) used to evaluate the health status of patients with heart failure (HF) but has predominantly been tested in settings serving predominately white, male, and economically well-resourced populations. We sought to examine the acceptability of the shorter version of the KCCQ (KCCQ-12) among racially and ethnically diverse patients receiving care in an urban, safety-net setting. Methods We conducted cognitive interviews with a diverse population of patients with heart failure in a safety net system to assess their perceptions of the KCCQ-12. We conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data then mapped themes to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model of Behavior framework. Results We interviewed 18 patients with heart failure and found that patients broadly endorsed the concepts of the KCCQ-12 with minor suggestions to improve the instrument’s content and appearance. Although patients accepted the KCCQ-12, we found that the instrument did not adequately measure aspects of health care and quality of life that patients identified as being important components of managing their heart failure. Patient-important factors of heart failure management coalesced into three main themes: social support, health care environment, and mental health. Conclusions Patients from this diverse, low-income, majority non-white population experience unique challenges and circumstances that impact their ability to manage disease. In this study, patients were receptive to the KCCQ-12 as a tool but perceived that it did not adequately capture key health components such as mental health and social relationships that deeply impact their ability to manage HF. Further study on the incorporation of social determinants of health into PROMs could make them more useful tools in evaluating and managing HF in diverse, underserved populations.

Social Determinants of Health in Women With Heart Failure: Prospective Observational Cohort Study

“…The KCCQ questionnaire does not assess mental and social aspects of heart failure-related patient-reported outcomes. 28 Therefore, incorporating the SDoH risk assessment into routine clinical practice would not overlap with the KCCQ-12 questionnaire.…”

Patient-reported outcome measurement in palliative care: A hermeneutic narrative review

“…In a recent study of patients with heart failure, although receptive to using the PROM provided, participants expressed that the PROM did not adequately capture key issues such as mental health and social relationships. (Davis et al 2022) A study of patients with lung cancer showed that the PROM did not capture the complexity of the symptom of breathlessness including experiential dimensions (Ji Hyun Sung et al 2020). Thus, clinicians are at risk of not exploring distress more globally, including psycho-existential distress, and vice versa.…”

Soluble Transferrin Receptor as Iron Deficiency Biomarker: Impact on Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Patients

“…In this context, patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (QoL), and functional outcomes, such as exercise capacity, are also greatly impaired and strongly correlate with clinical outcomes. Importantly, these two functional status measures are considered highly relevant outcomes from the patient’s and healthcare professional’s perspective [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”