“…Adherence and education P= 0.024 with 22% more adherence in participants with secondary education [21] Caretaker's educational level and reported adherence showed no statistically significance (p=0.354) [27] [18-21,2 P=0.005 with participants with ≤ 7ys of formal education more likely to adhere [18] Participants educational level was not associated with reasons for nonadherence (p=0.825) [24] P<0.01; OR 0.074; 95% CI 0.017-0.322. higher education level was associated with ACT adherence [20] There was no statistically significant association between the educational level of patients or caregivers and probably adherence (p=1.00) [29] Uptake of IPTp-SP increased with education, from as low as 38.9% among those who had no education to as high as 52.3% among those with secondary and higher education.Women with secondary and higher education were almost twice as likely as those who had never been to school for formal education to receive complete IPTp-SP doses (RRR=1.93, 95% CI 1.04 -3.56). (P <0.001) [26] No association between educational level and adherence/non-adherence [19] The adjusted odds of completed treatment for those who has finished primary school was 1.68 times that of patients who has not (95% CI: 1.20, 2.36; P=0.003) [28] No significant for mothers' attainment of tertiary (or higher) education and the use of ACTs (OR 0.905, CI0.195-4.198; P=0.898) [25] There was a statistically significant association between fathers' attainment of tertiary (higher education) and use of ACTs, when compared to fathers who had not attained this level of education (OR 0.054, CI 0.006-0.510; P=0.011) [25] Adherence and income P=0.003; OR 0.340; 95% CI, 0.167-0.694. higher income level (Ksh >9000 (i.e., >GBP 66 monthly) was associated with ACT adherence [20] [14,20,2 7,31] P=0.034 with participants of higher income salary showing correct dosage of drugs [31] Initiation of home treatment was higher in the poorer households.…”