Do patients with knee osteoarthritis perform sit-to-stand motion efficiently?

Anan, Masaya; Shinkoda, Koichi; Suzuki, Kentaro; Yagi, Masahide; Ibara, Takuya; Kito, Nobuhiro

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.015

Cited by 47 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(3) Are the characteristics of the subjects included in the study clearly described? (6) Are the main findings of the study clearly described? (7) Does the study provide estimates of the variability in the data for the main outcomes?…”

Section: Qualitymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Standing up from the sitting position Anan (2008) [17] x x x 9 75.0 Yes Anan (2015) [6] x x x x 8 66.7 Yes Burnfield (2012) [3] x x x x 8 66.7 Yes cacciatore (2011) [20] x x x 9 75.0 Yes Fotoohabadi (2010) [11] x x 10 83.3 Yes Gilleard (2008) [19] x x 10 83.3 Yes Ikeda (1991) [23] x x x x x 7 58.3 No Johnson (2010) [21] x x x 9 75.0 Yes Johnson (2010) [22] x x x 9 75.0 Yes Kinoshita (2015) [25] x x 10 83.3 Yes Kim (2014) [26] x x x 9 75.0 Yes Leardini (2011) [27] x x x x 8 66.7 Yes Park (2014) [28] x [29] x x x x x x 6 50.0 No (1) Is the objective and hypothesis of the study clearly described? (2) Are the main outcomes to be measured clearly described in the introduction or materials and methods section?…”

Section: Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…the factors related to the chair comprise the seat height, the armrest, the backrest, and special chairs [3][4][5]. the factors related to the subject are age, illnesses, graduation of muscle strength, and utilization of shoes [6]. the factors related to the strategy come from the standing up movement: speed, feet position, utilization of the armrest, arms movement, joints stabilization in general, knee position, final restriction of movement, visual control, attention during the movement, training, position, and movement of the trunk [7,8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Lumbar spine, pelvis and hip sit-to-stand assessment protocols and ROM reference values: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Gelain¹,

Schmit²,

Mesquita³

et al. 2018

Hum Mov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. the evaluation of the sit-to-stand (StS) movement has been widely studied; however, very different protocols are used, making it difficult to choose a methodology. So, the purposes of this study were: (1) to identify the StS movement assessment protocols for lumbar spine, pelvis, or hip on the basis of video image analysis; (2) to investigate the reference values for these regions range of motion (ROM) using a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods. the searches were conducted in BIREME, Embase, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases; manual searches were also performed. two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias. the methodological quality was verified by the Downs and Black scale and the strength of evidence by the GRADE system. Seventeen studies were included, from which data on sample, evaluation protocols, and ROM angles were extracted. Results and conclusions. the studies showed high strength of evidence. Acquisition protocols diverged, but most of the studies utilized 3D video image analysis with optoelectronic systems, backless seat with adjustable height, and asking the subject to perform 3 trials of the movement in self-referred speed, keeping the arms crossed. the meta-analysis provided reference values for adults hip ROM (compared with the thigh) of 81.19-93.71°. For the elderly, the angles for lumbar spine and hip position at the start of the StS movement were 0.20-3.99° and 73.58-78.06°, respectively.Citation: Gelain GM, Schmit EFD, De Mesquita PV, candotti ct. Lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip sit-to-stand assessment pro tocols and ROM reference values: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hum Mov. 2018;19(3):3-15; doi: https://doi. org/10.5114/hm.2018.76074.

show abstract

Section: Qualitymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lumbar spine, pelvis and hip sit-to-stand assessment protocols and ROM reference values: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Gelain¹,

Schmit²,

Mesquita³

et al. 2018

Hum Mov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, this cursory analysis revealed a very broad spectrum of muscular mechanisms possibly involved in the osteoarthritisdisability cycle, including: muscle strength deficits [14,15] , abnormal muscle activation patterns [16] , abnormal muscle loading forces [17] , proprioception problems [18] , muscle inflammation [19] , deficits in muscle rate of torque development [20] , abnormally coordinated muscle function [21] muscle structural abnormalities [22] , muscle flexor/ extensor imbalances [23] , and problems attributed to impaired muscle afferent activity [24] . To discern if any of these factors are associated with functional activities of daily living, and if so in what way, only studies that examined muscle function in the context of functional activities in knee osteoarthritis cohorts who had no surgical history were examined.…”

Section: General Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Muscle Function during Selected Weight-Bearing Activities in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis- A Narrative Overview

Marks¹

2016

International Journal of Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Biomechanical assessment of patients with FAI during ADL may provide researchers and clinicians with the knowledge needed PM R 9 (2017) 563-570 www.pmrjournal.org to detect this pathology at an early stage and possibly reduce the adverse effects of this pathology on hip joint health and function. Assessment of biomechanical function during the sitto-stand (STS) task has been performed in patients with patellofemoral joint OA [5], knee joint OA [6][7][8], and hip OA [9], as well as in patients after total hip arthroplasty [10] and in healthy adults [11][12][13][14], but it is yet to be assessed in the FAI population. The STS task has been suggested to be the most mechanically demanding ADL [15] and is performed by adults an average of 60 times per day [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abnormal Joint Moment Distributions and Functional Performance During Sit‐to‐Stand in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients

Samaan

Schwaiger

Gallo

et al. 2016

PM&R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a morphological abnormality of the hip joint that causes pain when performing a mechanically demanding activity of daily living such as the sit-to-stand (STS) task. Previous studies have assessed lower extremity joint mechanics during a STS task in various pathologies yet the STS task has not been studied in FAI patients. Objective To identify differences in joint kinetics and performance between FAI patients and healthy controls during a STS task. It is hypothesized that FAI patients will exhibit altered time needed to complete the STS task as well as altered lower extremity biomechanics when compared to healthy controls. Design Cross-Sectional Cohort Study Setting Motion capture laboratory at an institutional orthopaedic facility Participants Biomechanical analysis was performed in 17 FAI patients and 31 age and body mass index (BMI) matched healthy controls during the STS task. Methods Sagittal plane joint moments, total support moment (TSM), joint contributions to the TSM and functional measures during the STS task were compared between groups. Main Outcome Measurements Peak joint moments, TSM and joint contributions to the TSM were assessed during the STS task. In addition, the time to and value of the peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), limb symmetry index at peak vGRF, loading rate and total time needed to perform the STS task were determined. Results Compared to the control participants, the FAI patients exhibited worse HOOS pain and function sub-scores. No group differences were observed in peak sagittal joint moments during the STS task. However, when compared to controls, the FAI patients demonstrated reduced knee joint contributions to the TSM. In addition, the FAI patients exhibited increased time needed to perform the STS task, increased time to reach peak vGRF and reduced lower extremity loading rate during the STS task. Conclusions FAI patients demonstrated abnormal joint contributions to TSM and altered functional performance during the STS task. These altered movement patterns during the STS task may be compensatory mechanisms used by the FAI patients to reduce pain and improve function.

show abstract

Do patients with knee osteoarthritis perform sit-to-stand motion efficiently?

Cited by 47 publications

References 18 publications

Lumbar spine, pelvis and hip sit-to-stand assessment protocols and ROM reference values: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Lumbar spine, pelvis and hip sit-to-stand assessment protocols and ROM reference values: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Muscle Function during Selected Weight-Bearing Activities in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis- A Narrative Overview

Abnormal Joint Moment Distributions and Functional Performance During Sit‐to‐Stand in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About