2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200101000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Pediatric Trauma Centers Have Better Survival Rates than Adult Trauma Centers? An Examination of the National Pediatric Trauma Registry

Abstract: Although PTCs have higher overall survival rates than ATCs, this difference disappears when the analysis controls for Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, age, mechanism, and ACS verification status. ACS-verified centers have significantly higher survival rates than do unverified centers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
79
4
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
79
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Due to the distinctive biomechanics and anthropometrics of children's spinal cords, 60%-80% of all pediatric cord injuries are cervical. 4 Despite the continued improvements in treatment that help many children survive SCI, most injuries will cause permanent disability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Due to the distinctive biomechanics and anthropometrics of children's spinal cords, 60%-80% of all pediatric cord injuries are cervical. 4 Despite the continued improvements in treatment that help many children survive SCI, most injuries will cause permanent disability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have attempted to determine which types of centers provide the best care to injured children (pediatric trauma centers v. adult trauma centers v. mixed trauma centers), however these studies use overall in-hospital mortality rates as a basis for comparison [5][6][7][8][9]. We believe that the PDR is a more appropriate area of focus as it quantifies the number of patients who died as a result of deficiencies in care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides an important tool by which policymakers may assess and potentially increase the return on healthcare investments [5]. Although CEA is most useful for the evaluation of new technologies such as in knee and hip arthroplasties, there may be a place for CEA in pediatrics surgery [5,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-centered outcomes capture the impact of a patient's overall well-being much better than traditional, surgeon-defined outcomes such as mortality or infection rates [28]. Generic health utilities have limited value in pediatric quality of care evaluation because of they are illequipped to account for the developmental changes resulting from normal growth and many are only appropriate for older children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%