2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do people really want renewable energy? Who wants renewable energy?: Discrete choice model of reference-dependent preference in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, scenarios were set up such that the shares of solar PV and wind power generations increased to about 7% of the total power generation (labeled as SOL and WIN scenario, respectively, in Table 5 ). Here, 7% was set based on the solar PV and wind power generation targets in Korea’s “Renewable Energy 3020” plan [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Meanwhile, the increase in renewable energy sources is achieved through financial support from the government.…”
Section: Model Structure and Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, scenarios were set up such that the shares of solar PV and wind power generations increased to about 7% of the total power generation (labeled as SOL and WIN scenario, respectively, in Table 5 ). Here, 7% was set based on the solar PV and wind power generation targets in Korea’s “Renewable Energy 3020” plan [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Meanwhile, the increase in renewable energy sources is achieved through financial support from the government.…”
Section: Model Structure and Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Korean government announced the “Renewable Energy 3020” plan in 2017 to promote renewable energy. It sought to increase the share of renewable energy in power generation to 20% by 2030 [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. The plan included large-scale investments in solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power generation facilities, and related government support, which would add 30.8 GW (16.5 GW) of solar PV (wind) power generation capacity by 2030.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic impact is in the form of incentives that are needed for the public to accept RE plant projects. Finding the public's MWTA will be one of the goals of this study, differentiating it from other studies, which mainly focused on the public's marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) [6][7][8][9]. Several studies, such as that by Woo et al [4] and Botelho et al [10], also estimated the willingness to accept (WTA) for wind, solar, biomass, and hydropower power plants, but they used the contingent valuation method (CVM) for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combustion of fossil fuels is largely responsible for the problems of climate change, air pollution and energy insecurity (Hanh and Kakinaka, 2019;Zerrahn et al, 2018). A combination of wind, water and solar energy is the best alternative to fossil fuels (Lewis, 2007), (ASTM G-173-03, 2002), because renewable sources of energy have almost zero emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants (Kim et al, 2018), , no long-term waste disposal problems and no risk of catastrophic accidents (Delucchi and Jacobson, 2013;Bulut and Gonul, 2018;Harjanne and Korhonen, 2019;Zeng et al, 2019). Environmental and social problems related to energy use have motivated the development of sustainable energy technologies (Baruah and Enweremadu, 2019;Moorthy et al, 2019;Washburn and Romero, 2019), such as wind turbines, carbon capture and storage, and hydrogen vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%