Do perceived working conditions and patient safety culture correlate with objective workload and patient outcomes: A cross-sectional explorative study from a German university hospital

Abstract

BackgroundWorkload and demands on hospital staff have been growing over recent years. To ensure patient and occupational safety, hospitals increasingly survey staff about perceived working conditions and safety culture. At the same time, routine data are used to manage resources and performance. This study aims to understand the relation between survey-derived measures of how staff perceive their work-related stress and strain and patient safety on the one hand, and routine data measures of workload and quality of care (patient safety) on the other.MethodsWe administered a written questionnaire to all physicians and nurses in the inpatient units at a German university hospital. The questionnaire was an amalgam of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) scale to assess patient-related burnout of and portions of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC). Indicators from administrative data used to assess workload and patient-related work-strain were: amount of overtime worked, work intensity recording of nurses, cost weight, occupancy rate and DRG-related length of stay. Quality of care was assessed using readmission rates and disease-related length of stay. Univariate associations were tested with Pearson correlations.ResultsResponse rate were 37% (224) for physicians and 39% (351) for nurses. Physicians’ overtime correlated strongly with perceived quantitative demands (.706, 95% CI: 0.634 to 0.766), emotional demands (.765; 95% CI: 0.705 to 0.814), and perceived role conflicts (.655, 95% CI: 0.573 to 0.724). Nurses’ work-intensity measures were associated with decreasing physician job satisfaction and with less favorable perceptions of the appropriateness of staffing (-.527, 95% CI:-0.856 to 0.107). Both professional groups showed medium to strong associations between the morbidity measure (cost weight) and role conflicts; between occupancy rates and role clarity (-.482, 95% CI: -0.782 to -0.02) and predictability of work (-.62, 95% CI: -0.848 to -0.199); and between length of stay and internal team functioning (-.555, 95% CI: -0.818 to -0.101). Higher readmission rates were associated with lower perceived patient safety (-.476, 95% CI: -0.779 to 0.006), inadequate staffing (-.702, 95% CI: -0.884 to -0.334), and worse team functioning (-.520, 95% CI: -0.801 to -0.052). Shorter disease-related length of stay was associated with better teamwork within units (-.555, 95% CI: -0.818 to -0.101) and a lower risk of physician burnout (-.588, 95% CI: -0.846 to -0.108).ConclusionPerceptions of hospital personnel regarding sub-optimal workplace safety and teamwork issues correlated with worse patient outcome measures. Furthermore, objective measures of overtime work as well as objective measures of workload correlated clearly with subjective work-related stress and strain. This suggests that objective workload measures (such as overtime worked) could be used to indirectly monitor job-related psychosocial strain on employees and, thus, improve not only staff wellb...

The role of transformational leadership, job demands and job resources for patient safety culture in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional study

“…Bakker and Demerouti specifically mention the supervisory relationship and supportive feedback as important resources. The results of previous studies suggest that work environmental factors related to job demands and job resources influence patient safety outcomes [12,22,25]. Based on the job-demands resources theory and previous literature, we hypothesize that job demands are negatively associated with patient safety culture and overall perception of patient safety.…”

“…There is no simple answer to the question of how health care can become safer, but safety culture is considered a key area of focus for the coming years [7,10]. Moreover, the results of several studies suggest that there may be a positive relationship between patient safety culture and perceived working conditions, and positive objective patient outcomes such as reduction in the frequency of falls and reduced mortality rates, as well as increased patient satisfaction [11,12].…”

Comparing perceived psychosocial working conditions of nurses and physicians in two university hospitals in Germany with other German professionals - feasibility of scale conversion between two versions of the German Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)

“…The WorkSafeMed study ("Working conditions, safety culture and patient safety in hospitalswhat predicts the safety of the medication process") was a crosssectional, multicenter, mixed-methods project conducted between 2014 and 2017 [15][16][17][18]. The study included a staff survey using a standardized paper-based questionnaire to assess psychosocial working conditions (G-COPSOQ II), patient and occupational safety cultures [15,16], a chart review to evaluate the quality of the medication process [17] and the explorative correlation analysis of questionnaire and routine data to depict workload and quality of care [18].…”

Linking transformational leadership, patient safety culture and work engagement in home care services

“…Several studies argue for the importance of work environment for patient safety (Nahrgang, Morgeson, & Hofmann, ; Olds, Aiken, Cimiotti, & Lake, ; Sturm et al, ). Similarly, employee engagement is found to be associated with patient safety culture (Biddison, Paine, Murakami, Herzke, & Weaver, ).…”