2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do persons with asymmetric hip pain or radiographic hip OA have worse pain and structure outcomes in the knee opposite the more affected hip? Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Abstract: Purpose to determine if asymmetry between hips in pain or radiographic osteoarthritis (RHOA) is associated with worse pain and joint space narrowing (JSN) at baseline and longitudinally in knees contralateral to more affected hips. Methods We studied 279 participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative with baseline asymmetry between hips in pain and 483 with asymmetry in RHOA none of whom had a hip replacement for ≥4 years after baseline. RHOA assessed from pelvis radiographs was categorized as none, possible … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher CF on the contralateral (non-operated) side in the second half of stance compared to the ipsilateral side confirm the results of other studies (Shakoor et al, 2003;Foucher and Wimmer, 2012;Wesseling et al, 2018), although not all studies reported significant differences between patients (ipsilateral or contralateral) and healthy controls (Wesseling et al, 2018) so that a surplus load cannot be confirmed. The present results do support studies reporting a higher risk for the development of OA in the contralateral knee joint after THR (Shakoor et al, 2002;Umeda et al, 2009;Gillam et al, 2013;Jungmann et al, 2015;Joseph et al, 2016) since patients are walking with an asymmetrical limb load. However, these studies only report more structural damage and progression of degenerative findings in the contralateral knee and do not specify the medial or lateral knee compartment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Higher CF on the contralateral (non-operated) side in the second half of stance compared to the ipsilateral side confirm the results of other studies (Shakoor et al, 2003;Foucher and Wimmer, 2012;Wesseling et al, 2018), although not all studies reported significant differences between patients (ipsilateral or contralateral) and healthy controls (Wesseling et al, 2018) so that a surplus load cannot be confirmed. The present results do support studies reporting a higher risk for the development of OA in the contralateral knee joint after THR (Shakoor et al, 2002;Umeda et al, 2009;Gillam et al, 2013;Jungmann et al, 2015;Joseph et al, 2016) since patients are walking with an asymmetrical limb load. However, these studies only report more structural damage and progression of degenerative findings in the contralateral knee and do not specify the medial or lateral knee compartment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Clinical readings were specifically performed for this study, whereas OAI readings were performed for an ancillary OAI study (11). Readers were blinded to clinical information and other imaging results.…”
Section: Image Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis experience a decline in physical function and often report difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADL) [ 6 ]. Recent work has shown that osteoarthritis patients place increased compensatory stress on their unaffected weight-bearing joints during ADL, a vicious cycle that makes them susceptible to further damage and worsened severity of disease [ 7 - 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%