Do Positive Anaerobic Culture Results Affect Physicians’ Clinical Management Decisions?

Abstract

Background.Aerobic and anaerobic cultures from body fluids, abscesses, and wounds are ordered routinely. Prior studies have shown that the results of anaerobic blood cultures do not frequently lead to changes in patient management.Methods.We performed a retrospective chart review to determine whether positive results of anaerobic tissue and fluid cultures (excluding blood) affect physicians’ treatment approaches. Of 3234 anaerobic cultures, 174 unique patient admissions had positive cultures and met inclusion criteria.Results.Only 18% (n = 31) of patient charts with positive cultures had documented physician acknowledgment (90.3% of acknowledgments by infectious diseases physicians), with 9% (n = 15) leading to change in antibiotic regimens based on results. Seventy percent of all patients received initial empiric antibiotics active against anaerobes. Of the remaining 30% (inappropriate, unknown, or no empiric coverage), 1 regimen change was documented after culture results were known.Conclusions.Given the lack of management change based on results of anaerobic wound cultures, the value of routine anaerobic culturing is of questionable utility.

Impact of Adjunctive Diode Laser Application to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy on Clinical, Microbiological and Immunological Outcomes in Management of Chronic Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of Human Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

“… 64 Nevertheless, the process of culturing the anaerobic bacteria is very challenging which may influence the outcomes. 65 In view of the fact that the number of studies which conducted microbial analyses is limited, the diversity in treatment protocols and methodologies used for microbiological analysis have become problematic. The majority of these studies used various microbial analyses which have coincided with pathogen reduction.…”

No differences in short-term outcomes between patients with anaerobic and aerobic culture positive prosthetic joint infection

“…15 Furthermore, cultures take longer to turn positive with anaerobic infections than those caused by aerobic microorganisms. 16 Despite these differences in clinical presentation and diagnostic test results, we hypothesized that there would be no differences in overall outcomes in PJI patients infected by anaerobic organisms versus those infected by aerobic organisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical presentation, duration of antibiotics, type of treatment provided, and final outcome between PJI patients with anaerobic infection and those with aerobic infection.…”