2021
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do pretransplant C‐peptide levels predict outcomes following simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation? A matched case‐control study

Abstract: Following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), survival outcomes are reported as equivalent in patients with detectable pretransplant C-peptide levels (Cp+) and a "type 2″ diabetes mellitus (DM) phenotype compared to type 1 (Cp negative [Cp-]) DM. We retrospectively compared 46 Cp+ patients pretransplant (≥2.0 ng/mL, mean 5.4 ng/mL) to 46 Cp-(level < 0.5 ng/mL) case controls matched for recipient age, gender, race, and transplant date. Early outcomes were comparable. Actual 5-year patient survi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet some have claimed the C-peptide level may not matter much. 20 There are little data to support decision-making related to this clinical question. In this cohort of 76 SPK recipients with T2DM, we analyzed our outcomes in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet some have claimed the C-peptide level may not matter much. 20 There are little data to support decision-making related to this clinical question. In this cohort of 76 SPK recipients with T2DM, we analyzed our outcomes in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contraindications to SPKT at our center included age >65 years; insufficient cardiovascular reserve; current substance abuse; active infection or recent malignancy; major ongoing psychiatric illness, recent noncompliance, or lack of adequate social support; significant obesity (body mass index [BMI] >32 kg/m 2 ); severe vascular disease; or inability to either understand or commit to the more intense follow‐up associated with SPKT compared to kidney transplantation alone. Selection criteria for SPKT in patients with a type 2 diabetes phenotype included patients <65 years of age, insulin‐requiring for a minimum of 3 years with a total daily insulin requirement <1 u/kg/day, a fasting C‐peptide level <12 ng/ml, absence of severe vascular disease or tobacco abuse, adequate cardiac function, and presence of “complicated” or hyperlabile diabetes 22,24 . For purposes of this study, type 2 diabetes was defined as having a pretransplant C‐peptide level ≥2.0 ng/ml ( n = 50).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection criteria for SPKT in patients with a type 2 diabetes phenotype included patients <65 years of age, insulin‐requiring for a minimum of 3 years with a total daily insulin requirement <1 u/kg/day, a fasting C‐peptide level <12 ng/ml, absence of severe vascular disease or tobacco abuse, adequate cardiac function, and presence of “complicated” or hyperlabile diabetes. 22 , 24 For purposes of this study, type 2 diabetes was defined as having a pretransplant C‐peptide level ≥2.0 ng/ml ( n = 50).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 The group from Wake Forest also recently updated their experience reporting that C-peptide positive patients had significantly worse 5-y pancreas graft survival, which was attributed to posttransplant weight gain, insulin resistance, and rejection. 10 Here, Parajuli et al specifically evaluate pretransplant fasting C-peptide level and subsequent graft function in T2DM patients who underwent SPK, identifying several important concepts. Recipients were defined as T2DM according to a previously reported scoring system and were stratified according to their pretransplant fasting C-peptide as either low (<2 ng/mL), medium (2-8 ng/mL), or high (>8 ng/mL).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%