2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4035457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Psychologists Accept, Prefer, and Use Imaginal Exposure Over Other Techniques to Treat Generalized Anxiety? A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique has effects as a standalone treatment and as part of CBT (Behar et al, 2009; Hoyer et al, 2009), and written variations show good outcomes (Fracalanza et al, 2014; Goldman et al, 2007). Yet the optimal parameters of imaginal exposure remain unclear and the technique has low clinician acceptability (Ross, 2018), which may be enhanced by the addition of rescripting (Arntz et al, 2007). Moreover, GAD is characterized by profound treatment resistance—CBT is reliably effective in only two‐thirds of cases (Robichaud et al, 2019)—and a relapsing course (Gyani et al, 2013), which suggests scope to improve treatment for GAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique has effects as a standalone treatment and as part of CBT (Behar et al, 2009; Hoyer et al, 2009), and written variations show good outcomes (Fracalanza et al, 2014; Goldman et al, 2007). Yet the optimal parameters of imaginal exposure remain unclear and the technique has low clinician acceptability (Ross, 2018), which may be enhanced by the addition of rescripting (Arntz et al, 2007). Moreover, GAD is characterized by profound treatment resistance—CBT is reliably effective in only two‐thirds of cases (Robichaud et al, 2019)—and a relapsing course (Gyani et al, 2013), which suggests scope to improve treatment for GAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%