Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research

Abstract

Public transport improvements may increase economic productivity if they enable the growth and densification of cities, downtowns, or industrial clusters and thereby increase external agglomeration economies. It has been argued that the potential agglomeration benefits are large; if so, understanding them better would be useful in making funding decisions about public transport improvements. We reviewed theoretical and empirical literature on agglomeration as well as a small number of articles on transportation's role in agglomeration. The theoretical literature is useful in understanding possible avenues by which transportation improvements might affect agglomeration, although there is little discussion of public transport specifically. Relevant empirical studies tend to focus on metropolitan regions and use a generalized measure of transportation cost. But public transport impacts on agglomeration are likely to be different from road investment impacts. We identified several ways of conducting research building on this literature that would help evaluate the agglomeration impacts of public transport proposals: tracing the links between transport, agglomeration, and productivity; better motivating research using theories of agglomeration mechanisms; taking scale and redistribution into account; exploring the functional form of agglomeration economies; accounting for endogeneity in model structure; and considering development context.

Sustainable Urban External Service Function Development for Building the International Megalopolis in the Pearl River Delta, China

“…[4][5][6][7]53] The same measure that has already been implemented in a given setting can produce a different outcome when implemented in another setting. Additionally, relatively small policy interventions can produce a large impact on regional economic activity [54][55][56][57].…”

Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Productivity and Economic Growth: Recent Advances and Research Challenges

“…Sparked by the influential work of Aschauer (1989), a massive amount of research has examined the contribution of transport infrastructure to the productivity of private factors of production and to economic growth by various macroeconomic models. Previous theoretical analysis and empirical evidence have significantly improved our understanding of the agglomeration impacts of public transport improvements (Chatman & Noland, 2011), non-transport benefits from transport (rail) investment (Banister & Thurstain-Goodwin, 2011), the wider economic benefits of transport infrastructure investment (Bhatta & Drennan, 2003;Lakshmanan, 2011;Vickerman, 2008), causality relationship, and the output elasticity of transport infrastructure on productivity and economic growth (by various macroeconomic models). These studies tend to demonstrate some fairly strong positive links between transport infrastructure, productivity and economic growth, and some indicate very substantial rates of return.…”

“…Banister and Thurstain-Goodwin (2011) suggest that transport (rail) investment affects the local economy at three different levels: output and productivity (at the macro-level), agglomeration economies and labour market effects (at the meso-level) and land and property market effects (at the micro-level). Chatman and Noland (2011) conduct a detailed literature review specifically related to the agglomeration impacts of transport improvements. It has been argued that public transport improvements (mainly in the form of faster and cheaper travel or service improvements) are capable of bringing substantial external benefits by enabling agglomeration economies: external economies of scale in density and diversity of firms, workers and residents, which hence leads to increased productivity.…”

Transport, economic competitiveness and competition: A city perspective

“…Despite the apparent importance of transport to the economy, Banister maintains there are many issues arising from the potential link between transport investment and economic growth, namely as to whether there is an implied causality, whether any economic development is new or merely a transfer from elsewhere Banister p also Chatman and Noland, 2011). It is worth noting that assumptions which treat travel time as unproductive are challenged to some extent by studies suggesting that finding that travel time can be, and often is, used for business and leisure activities especially since there are opportunities made available by new communication technologies, (Lyons and Urry, 2005;Lyons et al, 2007).…”