2019
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000002085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Quality Improvement Initiatives Improve Outcomes for Patients in Antiretroviral Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with other published reports of QI projects and QICs, which have shown success in enabling facility-level QI teams to design, test, and scale contextually appropriate interventions that improve the quality of health services ( Hargreaves et al, 2019 ; Schouten, Hulscher, van Everdingen, Huijsman, & Grol, 2008 ). As is typical for an QI project, there was no control group, so results at these 30 HFs cannot be compared with sites not participating in the QIC or generalized to other HF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are consistent with other published reports of QI projects and QICs, which have shown success in enabling facility-level QI teams to design, test, and scale contextually appropriate interventions that improve the quality of health services ( Hargreaves et al, 2019 ; Schouten, Hulscher, van Everdingen, Huijsman, & Grol, 2008 ). As is typical for an QI project, there was no control group, so results at these 30 HFs cannot be compared with sites not participating in the QIC or generalized to other HF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This can involve a quality improvement (QI) intervention designed and implemented based on qualitative and quantitative assessment findings. QI approaches have been increasingly used in healthcare to improve health outcomes over the years [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The WHO defines QI as “a change in process in a health-care system, service, or supplier to increase the likelihood of optimal clinical quality of care measured by positive health outcomes for individuals and populations” [ 55 ].…”
Section: An Implementation Research Approach To Assessing and Remedying Mov: Conceptual And Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with most QIC projects and time-series analyses, inferring causality between the intervention and the results in the current study is limited by the absence of a control or comparison group, and generalizability is limited by the nonrandom selection of HFs. 40 However, expert consensus suggests that randomized studies of QI project effectiveness are likely to be an inappropriate study method and that statistical process control FIGURE 3. Improvements in Early Testing, Timely Return of Test Results, and Antiretroviral Initiation From Baseline to Endline After Implementing a Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach, Cameroon and Zambia methods such as the use of run charts are the preferred approach to determining project success.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%