2022
DOI: 10.31545/intagr/146934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do reduced water and nitrogen input in rice production necessarily reduce yield?

Abstract: This study explored the effects of water and nitrogen management on yields, as well as water and nitrogen use efficiency, in the production of rice (Oryza sativa L.). The study aimed to provide theoretical and technical support for high yield practices and efficient resource utilization. Three replicate splitplot experiments were conducted in the field using flooding irrigation and controlled irrigation as the primary treatments. The secondary treatments included no nitrogen application, the farmers' usual nit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment employed a two-factor, completely randomized design, incorporating diverse strategies for managing N fertilizer and different varieties. Based on a stable and efficient reduction of nitrogen application rate of 150 kg N hm -2 ( Sun et al., 2023 ), three N management practices were established: zero N (denoted as N 0 ), local farmer practice (basal N fertilizer: tillering N fertilizer: panicle N fertilizer=7:3:0, denoted as N 1 ) ( Shu et al., 2021 ; Shu et al., 2022 ), postponing N topdressing (basal N fertilizer: tillering N fertilizer: panicle N fertilizer=3:1:6, denoted as N 2 ). The N fertilizer (urea) was managed as follows: The base fertilizer was applied 1 d before transplanting, the tillering fertilizer was applied 7 d after transplanting, and the panicle fertilizer was applied at a 1:1 ratio during the inverse fourth-leaf and second-leaf stages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment employed a two-factor, completely randomized design, incorporating diverse strategies for managing N fertilizer and different varieties. Based on a stable and efficient reduction of nitrogen application rate of 150 kg N hm -2 ( Sun et al., 2023 ), three N management practices were established: zero N (denoted as N 0 ), local farmer practice (basal N fertilizer: tillering N fertilizer: panicle N fertilizer=7:3:0, denoted as N 1 ) ( Shu et al., 2021 ; Shu et al., 2022 ), postponing N topdressing (basal N fertilizer: tillering N fertilizer: panicle N fertilizer=3:1:6, denoted as N 2 ). The N fertilizer (urea) was managed as follows: The base fertilizer was applied 1 d before transplanting, the tillering fertilizer was applied 7 d after transplanting, and the panicle fertilizer was applied at a 1:1 ratio during the inverse fourth-leaf and second-leaf stages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%