2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2020195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Shareholder Rights Affect Syndicate Structure? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corporate purposes, working capital, debt repayment, takeover and commercial paper backup are the major purposes for the loans. The results are similar to recent empirical studies on bank loans (e.g., Ivashina, ; Bharath et al., ).…”
Section: Sample and Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Corporate purposes, working capital, debt repayment, takeover and commercial paper backup are the major purposes for the loans. The results are similar to recent empirical studies on bank loans (e.g., Ivashina, ; Bharath et al., ).…”
Section: Sample and Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The negative coefficients of the G‐index indicate that lead arrangers hold a smaller portion of bank loans and the syndication structure is less concentrated when borrowing firms have more anti‐takeover provisions. Consistent with recent empirical studies (e.g., Bharath et al., ), the results suggest that there is less conflict of interest between shareholders and creditors if borrowing firms have weak shareholder rights protections. More important, the negative coefficients of the interaction terms between the G‐index and vega suggest that vega 's effects on the syndication structure are attenuated as the G‐index increases, consistent with the notion that participant banks are less concerned by CEO risk‐taking incentives when borrowing firms have weak shareholder rights.…”
Section: Robustness Testssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations