1992
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0059:dscssi>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do smoothly curving, spiral-shaped inclusion trails signify porphyroblast rotation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative hypothesis for the formation of curved inclusion trails in garnet is that they are produced by progressive growth of garnet over successive orthogonal matrix foliations. According to this interpretation, the garnet remains stationary as the matrix deforms around it, and stages of porphyroblast growth are restricted to regimes in which deformation is not active (Bell, 1985; Bell et al. , 1992a,b; Hayward, 1992).…”
Section: Strain‐rate Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative hypothesis for the formation of curved inclusion trails in garnet is that they are produced by progressive growth of garnet over successive orthogonal matrix foliations. According to this interpretation, the garnet remains stationary as the matrix deforms around it, and stages of porphyroblast growth are restricted to regimes in which deformation is not active (Bell, 1985; Bell et al. , 1992a,b; Hayward, 1992).…”
Section: Strain‐rate Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a dissenting viewpoint holds that garnet porphyroblasts remain fixed with respect to geographical coordinates during dynamothermal metamorphism, and the internal textures within a garnet porphyroblast are produced by progressive overgrowth of garnet onto successive generations of matrix foliation surfaces (e.g. Bell, 1985; Bell et al. , 1992a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been strong disagreement and animated debate over the geological significance of strongly curved S i trails in porphyroblasts, especially the so-called 'snow-ball' inclusion patterns. One group of workers (Bell 1985;Bell and Johnson 1989;Bell et al 1992aBell et al , 1992bHickey and Bell 1999) have strongly argued that porphyroblasts do not rotate with respect to an external frame of reference and that even 'snow-ball' type spiral inclusion trails can be reinterpreted as a product of repeated overprinting deformation and transposition of the matrix foliation around a growing and non-rotating porphyroblast. The other group supports the existing and 'traditional' view of rotation of porphyroblasts in non-coaxial flow to explain strongly folded and rotated inclusion trails in porphyroblasts (Schoneveld 1979;Vernon 1988;Busa and Grey 1992;Visser and Mancktelow 1992;Passchier et al 1992;Williams and Jiang 1999;Jiang and Williams 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…spiral and staircase-shaped trails). Difficulty in dis- Johnson, 1989;Johnson, 1990a,b;Bell et al, 1992b;Aerden, 1995). The bulk flow is strongly partitioned tinguishing and correlating coevally developed portions of the inclusion trails makes it virtually impossible to into zones of high non-coaxial shear strain (represented by cleavage folia) that anastomose around ellipsoidal test the extent to which porphyroblasts have rotated relative to one another using the trace of S i alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%