Do social regulation strategies predict learning engagement and learning outcomes? A study of English language learners in wiki-supported literature circles activities

Li, Yanyan; Chen, Kailiang; Su, You; Yue, Xiangli

doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09934-7

Cited by 21 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Elaboration strategies performed on the learning content combined with critical thinking allows learners to deeply process learning content and to critically evaluate learning outcomes ( Li & Lajoie, 2021 ; Pellas, 2014 ; Woolley, 2011 ). Several studies have shown that resource management or regulation including time, study environment, and learning effort in online learning are related to behavioral and emotional engagement in learning ( Kassab, Al-Shafei, Salem, & Otoom, 2015 ; Li, Chen, Su, & Yue, 2021 ; Park & Yun, 2018 ). Importantly, as shown by Ketonen et al (2019) and Kuh (2003) , learning engagement is a strong predictor of learning achievement and has been extensively researched because of its high correlation with motivation, learner satisfaction, and learning achievement.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning engagement in blended learning during COVID-19

Heo

Bonk

Doo

2022

The Internet and Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning engagement in blended learning during COVID-19

Heo

Bonk

Doo

2022

The Internet and Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There is also a community circle interpersonal strategy. Community circles help increase member participation by increasing engagement among members (Li et al, 2021;Kayi-Aydar & Goering, 2019). Community circle teaching strategies are the most prominent interpersonal strategies (Silver et al, 2012).…”

Section: Kata Kuncimentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Adlerian Play Therapy Increase Social, Physical, and Task Appeal More Than Content Mastery Services in Elementary School Students?

Bilqis

2021

CEJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the difference in effectiveness between Adlerian Play Therapy and content mastery services in increasing physical, social, and task attractiveness to students in primary schools. The factorial design experimental method was applied to 72 fifth-grade students from two public elementary schools in Bandung, Indonesia, whose dimensions of attractiveness were lower than the other study groups. Each intervention carried out six meetings in different schools. Adlerian Play Therapy starts from the one-session relationship-building stage, the lifestyle investigation stage through the three-session secret book, the lifestyle understanding stage through one-session games, and the reorientation & re-education stage through one-session games. Classical guidance services for content mastery with a community circle strategy start from building relationships in two sessions, introducing the importance of one session, improving the social aspects of one session, improving the physical aspects of one session, and improving the aspects of one session assignments. Manova analyzed the Interpersonal Attraction Scale (IAS) instrument. Adlerian Play Therapy further enhances all dimensions of interpersonal attractiveness than content mastery services. Recommendations are aimed at counseling teachers to use Adlerian Play Therapy to increase children's social, physical, and assignment attractiveness. It is hoped that other researchers will research further related to increasing task attractiveness.

show abstract

“…Wikis, which refer to web pages with content that can be created and edited by one person or multiple people, are also an effective way to collaboratively create information (Duffy & Bruns, 2006;Kim & Kim, 2020;Li et al, 2021). In their study, in which the impact of the wiki on learning outputs is examined by conducting a metaanalysis on 25 pieces of research, Trocky & Buckley (2016) found out that learners' writing and collaborative working skills have increased.…”

Section: Conversation and Collaboration Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Orthogonal and oblique rotation methods are (Dershowitz & Treinen, 1998) b. Problem Representation Podcasting, Concept Maps (Besser et al, 2021), (Mitchell et al, 2021), (Moryl, 2013), (Novak, 1990), (Brown et al, 1989), (Brondfield et al, 2019), (Marzano & Miranda, 2021), (Shin & Jeong, 2021) c. Manipulation Space Simulation Tools, Electronic Spreadsheet Software (Jonassen, 1999) 2.Related Case Video Search Engines (Clifton & Mann, 2011), (Palla & Sheikh, 2020), (Ruggieri, 2020), (Halpern et al, 2020) 3.Information Resources Search Engines, E-Museums, Online Questionnaires, RSS (Lazonder, 2001), (Mracek, 2019), (Çalık et al, 2016), (Neill, 2008) (Bozanta & Mardikyan, 2017), (Zhang et al, 2016), (Warschauer, 1995), (Cassany et al, 2019), (Kapoor et al, 2019), (Ngaleka & Uys, 2013), (So, 2016), (Bouhnik & Deshen, 2014), (El Mhouti et al, 2016), (Arroyo et al, 2020), (Bakla, 2020), (Gurung et al, 2016), (Savelyeva et al, 2021), (Lin et al, 2014), (Ishtaiwa & Aburezeq, 2015), (Duffy & Bruns, 2006), (Kim & Kim, 2020), (Li et al, 2021) (Trocky & Buckley, 2016), (Ioannou et al, 2015),...…”

Section: Analysis Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

“…), E-Museums, Online Questionnaires, Web Feeds (RSS) (Lazonder, 2001), (Mracek, 2019), (Çalık et al, 2016), (Neill, 2008), (Sue & Ritter, 2011) 4. (Bozanta & Mardikyan, 2017), (Zhang et al, 2016), (Warschauer, 1995), (Cassany et al, 2019), (Kapoor et al, 2019), (Ngaleka & Uys, 2013), (So, 2016), (Bouhnik & Deshen, 2014), (El Mhouti et al, 2016), (Arroyo et al, 2020), (Bakla, 2020), (Gurung et al, 2016), (Savelyeva et al, 2021), (Lin et al, 2014), (Ishtaiwa & Aburezeq, 2015), (Duffy & Bruns, 2006), (Kim & Kim, 2020), (Li et al, 2021) (Trocky & Buckley, 2016), (Ioannou et al, 2015), (Shana, 2009), (Erdogdu & Eskimen, 2020), (Gurer, 2020), (Noel, 2015), (Amir et al, 2011), (Habeeb & Ebrahim, 2019), (Lam, 2020), (Luchoomun et al, 2010), (Jimoyiannis & Tsiotakis, 2016), (Nilsen, 2011), (Basri & Patak, 2015), (Sokolik, 2011), (Lonn & Teasley, 2009), (Warburton et al, 2009), (Dickey, 2003) 6.Social/Contextual Sup...…”

Section: Analysis Of the Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Competencies in Design-Based Learning Environments

Çakır

Bahadır

Tüfekci

2021

Designs for Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design-based learning (DBL) enables 21st-century skills to be gained through design-oriented production processes. Jonassen's "Designing Constructivist Learning Environments framework" (CLEs) is a suitable model for designing a DBL environment. In such learning environments, students must have a certain level of information and communication technology (ICT) competencies in order to achieve learning goals. The aim of the study is to build on ICT competency areas that are likely to be used in each phase of CLEs and to develop a scale in order to assess the usage of these technologies by students. The study is of importance in terms of enabling teachers to evaluate learners and themselves technologically before education starts in such an environment. Literature review, expert opinion, and focus group interview were conducted to develop the scale. In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, principal component analysis was conducted for each technology competency area identified on the scale. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the Cronbach's alpha values of the subscales of the measuring tool were between 0.817 and 0.993. Cronbach's alpha values above 0.80 indicate that the scale is adequately valid and reliable (Cronbach & Meehl, 1956). In line with these results, the "Design-based learning environments technological competencies scale" is considered being a suitable tool for assessing the ICT competency of teachers and students before starting teaching in learning environments based on the constructivist approach.

show abstract

Do social regulation strategies predict learning engagement and learning outcomes? A study of English language learners in wiki-supported literature circles activities

Cited by 21 publications

References 71 publications

Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning engagement in blended learning during COVID-19

Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning engagement in blended learning during COVID-19

Does Adlerian Play Therapy Increase Social, Physical, and Task Appeal More Than Content Mastery Services in Elementary School Students?

Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Competencies in Design-Based Learning Environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About