2004
DOI: 10.1080/1369145042000291797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do social workers avoid the dilemmas of work with clients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very important to me to give the clients contact information. (Social Worker) This approach looks very close to the one Musil described as "motherly approach" (Musil et al, 2004).…”
Section: The "Ethical Duty"-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is very important to me to give the clients contact information. (Social Worker) This approach looks very close to the one Musil described as "motherly approach" (Musil et al, 2004).…”
Section: The "Ethical Duty"-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…From an organizational point of view, the attention goes to studies focusing on lowering social services threshold, particularly for the vulnerable subjects who are the target of the outreach approach (Marsh, D'Aunno, & Smith, 2000;Walsh et al, 2011). This approach to access has been often criticized in the social work literature for being paternalistic or maternalistic (Grymonprez, Roose, & Roets, 2016;Maeseele, Bouverne-De Bie, & Roose, 2013;Musil, Kubalcikova, Hubikova, & Necasova, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Israeli study, for example, has found the need to improve organisational procedures relating to supervision and caseload size, and has demonstrated that lack of autonomy increases social workers' stress levels because it is experienced as undermining their ability to use their values, knowledge and skills in practice (Redmond et al 2008). Variously, research studies in Australia (Lonne et al 2004), the Czech Republic (Musil et al 2004), and Greece (Papadaki & Papadaki 2008) have expressed concerns about the pressure to comply with agency expectations, the erosion of ethical practice, the absence of challenge to organisational procedures and resistance to the requirements of the legal rules.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Demonstrating institutional success against imposed targets becomes the dominant culture, whilst other values are marginalised. The significance of organisational patterns of conduct, the dominance of compliance with employer expectations rather than professional norms when social workers respond to people's needs, management minimising the seriousness of people's expressed ethical concerns, and fear of the consequences of whistleblowing also feature in European, Israeli and Australian studies of social welfare (Lonne et al 2004;Musil et al 2004;Papadaki & Papadaki 2008;Mansbach & Bachner 2009;Månsson & Hedin forthcoming). The pressures to remain silent are strong and apparently universal.…”
Section: Sounds Of Silencementioning
confidence: 93%
“…From a US context, Madden (2007) argues that managers must know legal standards in order to structure the use of discretion and analyse practice decisions. Research from Australia (Lonne et al, 2004), the US (Strom-Gottfried, 2000), and Europe (Musil et al, 2004;Papadaki & Papadaki, 2008) reports unsettling evidence about the impact of organisational procedures on workers and the erosion of ethical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%