2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do spatial agglomeration and local labor market competition affect employer-provided training? Evidence from the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
58
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
58
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…regions where competition can be expected to be stronger. Brunello and Gambarotto (2007) do not identify poaching directly, but they show that regional density has a positive impact on voluntary job mobility, even more so for workers who have recently received training. Since part of the overall amount of voluntary job mobility could be instances of poaching, Brunello and Gambarotto (2007) argue that trained workers are more likely to get poached by other firms as regional employment density increases.…”
Section: Previous Empirical Evidence On Regional Labor Market Competimentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…regions where competition can be expected to be stronger. Brunello and Gambarotto (2007) do not identify poaching directly, but they show that regional density has a positive impact on voluntary job mobility, even more so for workers who have recently received training. Since part of the overall amount of voluntary job mobility could be instances of poaching, Brunello and Gambarotto (2007) argue that trained workers are more likely to get poached by other firms as regional employment density increases.…”
Section: Previous Empirical Evidence On Regional Labor Market Competimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Against this background, and because within-industry and within-occupation mobility allows for a better transfer of skills and knowledge acquired on the job, employers in dense regional labor markets are expected to be particularly reluctant to provide training to their workers. Empirical studies indeed find a negative relationship between regional competition and firm-sponsored training (Brunello and Gambarotto, 2007;Brunello and De Paola, 2008;Mühlemann and Wolter, 2011;Andini et al, 2013). …”
Section: Previous Empirical Evidence On Regional Labor Market Competimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These benefits are generally called labor market pooling effect. Knowledge spillover effects, often also dubbed human capital externalities, refer to a worker's learning from other workers in the same local market through formal and informal social interactions, such as imitating, social networking, job hopping, poaching, and learning by doing (Brunello and Gambarotto, 2007;Eriksson and Lindgren, 2009;Moretti, 2004a,c;Rosenthal and Strange, 2008). Labor market Marshallian externalities also operate through these channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%