2010
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Stool Form and Frequency Correlate With Whole-Gut and Colonic Transit? Results From a Multicenter Study in Constipated Individuals and Healthy Controls

Abstract: Stool form predicts delayed vs. normal transit in adults. However, only a moderate correlation exists between stool form and measured whole-gut or colonic transit time in constipated adults. In contrast, stool frequency is a poor surrogate for transit, even in those with reduced stool frequency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
163
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
163
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). Accordingly, transit time itself is correlated with the consistency of feces (41,42) which can be quantified by the Bristol stool scale (BSS), a diagnostic measure to formally score fecal consistency on a scale from 1 (separate hard lumps) through 7 (watery without solids; see SI Appendix, section 5.8, for a detailed analysis of the relation between transit time and BSS) (41). In agreement with our predictions (Fig.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…S5). Accordingly, transit time itself is correlated with the consistency of feces (41,42) which can be quantified by the Bristol stool scale (BSS), a diagnostic measure to formally score fecal consistency on a scale from 1 (separate hard lumps) through 7 (watery without solids; see SI Appendix, section 5.8, for a detailed analysis of the relation between transit time and BSS) (41). In agreement with our predictions (Fig.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, stool frequency correlates poorly with both measured whole-gut and colonic transit time, and only a modest correlation between GI transit and stool form exists in chronic constipated patients. 41 This strongly accentuates the limitations of studies using number of SBMs as the primary outcome measure, as it may potentially underestimate symptoms regarded more bothersome for the patient. Our study supports these results, as SBM frequency only changed on day 2, but other OIBD symptoms were present throughout the study along with the significant increased transit times in the colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No correlation has been observed between stool frequency and measured transit in constipated or healthy adults. 38 In constipated adults, stool form correlated well with colon transit, but this correlation was not detected in healthy controls. Thus, history taking pertaining to stool form is a simple and useful way to estimate CTT in constipated patients.…”
Section: Statementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…37 It uses simple visual illustration that is easily understood by patients, enabling them to recognize stool form and consistency. The BSFS is a reliable indicator of CTT 38 and particularly useful in patients reporting some discrepancy between the frequency of bowel movements and stool hardness. 26 Some patients complain of having constipation with a normal frequency of bowel movement and hard or lumpy stool, but in some cases, patients consider constipation to be having rare bowel movements with normal stool consistency.…”
Section: Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%