Do Street‐Level Bureaucrats Discriminate Based on Religion? A Large‐Scale Correspondence Experiment among American Public School Principals

Abstract

Although public administration scholars have long studied discrimination on the basis of race/ethnicity, class, and gender, little to no research exists on whether street‐level bureaucrats provide differential services based on the religious identity of their constituents. This article reports the results from a large‐scale correspondence study of street‐level bureaucrats in the American public school system. The authors emailed the principals of a large sample of public schools and asked for a meeting, randomly assigning the religious (non)affiliation of the family. To get at potential causal mechanisms, religious belief intensity was also randomly assigned. The findings show evidence of substantial discrimination against Muslims and atheists on a par with, and sometimes larger than, the racial discrimination found in previous studies. These individuals are substantially less likely to receive a response, with discrimination growing when they signal that their beliefs are more intense. Protestants and Catholics face no discrimination unless they signal that their religious beliefs are intense.

Racial Discrimination and Street‐Level Managers: Performance, Publicness, and Group Bias

“…The benefits of this approach over observational studies are clear: While observational studies can highlight concerning trends and correlations, field experiments and audit studies can more credibly articulate causal claims (Hess, Hanmer, and Nickerson 2016). As such, audit studies have proliferated and are now a relatively established method for studying racial and ethnic discrimination across the globe (Gaddis 2015; Olsen, Kyhse‐Andersen, and Moynihan 2020; Pfaff et al 2020; Slough 2020).…”

Through the Editor's Lens: Understanding the Editorial Role Through Metaphor

“…These findings offer new insight into the psychological mechanisms involved in the formation of change support within public organizations. Pfaff et al (2021) present disconcerting findings about discrimination (in the form of differentiated services) by street‐level bureaucrats on the basis of religious identity. Using a correspondence study of high school principals, they varied messaging about religious identity and intensity to discover substantial evidence of discrimination against Muslims and atheists but not Protestants or Catholics (unless they signal that their religious beliefs are intense).…”

Strukturell rasisme: et statsvitenskapelig perspektiv

“…Studien finner at politikerne er mer responsive til hvite velgere, selv når den hvite velgeren har en lav oppgitt sannsynlighet for å stemme på politikeren som kontaktes. Lignende eksperimentelle studier av diskriminering har blitt gjort på områder som skoleverket (Pfaff, Crabtree, Kern & Holbein, 2020), boligmarkedet (Hanson & Santas, 2014) og hos offentlige byråkrater (Crabtree, 2019, kap. 8).…”