2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the effects of prenatal exposure and acute treatment of methamphetamine on anxiety vary depending on the animal model used?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, it seems that animals, which were exposed to MA in utero , did not respond more robustly to the effect of an acute single drug dose. This is in contrast to the results of the most recent study of ours, which showed that prenatally MA‐exposed males treated with the same drug in adulthood, demonstrated increased anxiolytic behavior in the EPM test when compared to prenatally saline‐exposed males (Šlamberová et al, 2015). In this study the effect was mostly seen in the parameter of an approach‐avoid conflict, and it has been suggested that testing the sensitizing effect of prenatal MA exposure requires a detailed analysis, since the differences are not easily recognizable at first sight.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, it seems that animals, which were exposed to MA in utero , did not respond more robustly to the effect of an acute single drug dose. This is in contrast to the results of the most recent study of ours, which showed that prenatally MA‐exposed males treated with the same drug in adulthood, demonstrated increased anxiolytic behavior in the EPM test when compared to prenatally saline‐exposed males (Šlamberová et al, 2015). In this study the effect was mostly seen in the parameter of an approach‐avoid conflict, and it has been suggested that testing the sensitizing effect of prenatal MA exposure requires a detailed analysis, since the differences are not easily recognizable at first sight.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that tested the effect of psychostimulants on anxiety display inconsistent findings. In the EPM tests, acute and chronic exposure to psychostimulants was shown to have both, anxiogenic (Biala and Kruk, 2007; Hayase et al, 2005; Rogerio and Takahashi, 1992) and anxiolytic effects (Müller et al, 2008; Schutová et al, 2010; Šlamberová et al, 2015). The discrepancies among different studies might be related, at least in part, to different test settings, to drug dose used, time between drug injection and testing, route of administration, as well as strain and gender differences (Biala and Kruk, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the developmental effects of amphetamines might be similar to those induced by modafinil. Analogously as in this study with prenatal exposure of modafinil, chronic prenatal administration of methamphetamine or MDMA in rats and a challenge dose of the same drug in adulthood altered anxiety‐related behaviour in the elevated‐plus test (Navarro and Maldonado, 2002; Slamberova et al, 2015). However, a negative report was published as well (Macuchova et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Preclinical studies have shown analogous results, i.e. poor pregnancy results such as development of neonatal reflexes (McDonnell‐Dowling and Kelly, 2015a) after oral or subcutaneous administration (McDonnell‐Dowling and Kelly, 2016), memory impairment (Fialova et al, 2015; Macuchova et al, 2014; Slamberova et al, 2014) and increased anxiety in the adult offspring as assessed by different behavioural tests (Macuchova et al, 2016; Slamberova et al, 2015). In a similarly designed study a challenge dose of methamphetamine in adulthood in animals prenatally exposed to the same drug led to higher epileptiform neuronal activity in female rats (Matejovska et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Acuff-Smith et al (1996) showed that repeated administration of MA to pregnant rats resulted in a higher incidence of delivery failure and maternal death. It also shortened the gestation period, decreased the number of pups per litter, and slowed weight gain during pregnancy (Martin 1975, Martin et al 1976, Šlamberová et al 2006. Moreover, prenatal MA exposure has been shown to affect development of postural movements in the pups during the first three weeks of postnatal life (Malinová-Ševčíková et al , Šlamberová et al 2006(Malinová-Ševčíková et al , Šlamberová et al 2007.…”
Section: Sensitization Induced By Prenatal Drug Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%