2014
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the numbers and locations of road-killed anuran carcasses accurately reflect impacts of vehicular traffic?

Abstract: Road‐killed animals are easy and inexpensive to survey, and may provide information about species distributions, abundances, and mortality rates. As with any sampling method, however, we need to explore methodological biases in such data. First, how does an animal's behavior (e.g., use of the center vs. periphery of the road) influence its vulnerability to vehicular traffic? Second, how rapidly do post‐mortem processes (scavenging by other animals, destruction or displacement by subsequent vehicles) change the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to findings for other species of opportunistic feeding habits, such as black kite, red kite, booted eagle, and common buzzard, which, in some cases, feed on dead animals (Planillo et al, 2015). These predatory opportunistic species can prey 73 % of the animals run over in a few hours (Beckmann and Shine, 2015). Black kite, red kite and common buzzard can become accustomed to travelling and exploiting roads as a source of food (Blanco and Viñuela, 2004;Planillo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Involved Speciessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to findings for other species of opportunistic feeding habits, such as black kite, red kite, booted eagle, and common buzzard, which, in some cases, feed on dead animals (Planillo et al, 2015). These predatory opportunistic species can prey 73 % of the animals run over in a few hours (Beckmann and Shine, 2015). Black kite, red kite and common buzzard can become accustomed to travelling and exploiting roads as a source of food (Blanco and Viñuela, 2004;Planillo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Involved Speciessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Conducting a sampling of wildlife collisions in large areas such as Aragon is a difficult task due to multiple factors, such as detectability (detection of roadkills and injured birds) and carcass persistence times (removal of carcasses by scavenger species or disappearance by multiple vehicle run over) (Bishop and Brogan, 2013;Beckmann and Shine, 2015;Santos et al, 2015;Vidal-Vallés and Pérez-Collazos, 2016). La Alfranca WRC database has relevant data missing due to: (i) lack of game species records, (ii) bias related to areas with a lower/greater presence of Nature Protection Agents, (iii) data deletion of non-informative records (i.e.…”
Section: Methodological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study determined that variations in carcass persistence could also bias survey results, as persistence was much lower in small animals and easily influenced weather conditions [129]. Other studies flagged up survey interval [130], scavenger removal [131] and species detectability [132,133] as factors that would influence survey results. Such biased surveys are particularly concerning if mortality estimates are used to determine the impact of roads and road networks on a species, and particularly when species of concern are involved.…”
Section: Survey Design and Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs.). Species that linger on the road surface are more likely to be seen and counted in the survey grids (Beckmann and Shine 2015).…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Native Frog Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%