2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Abstract: Background Despite widespread use of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) during the past 10 years, little is known about why revisions are performed in hips with this bearing or the time elapsed before revision. Questions/purposes The purposes of this study were: (1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of early CoC bearing was initial acetabular fixation, thus CoC bearings have become tremendously popularized by newly developed CoC that employ modular design with metal acetabular shell in the early 2000s. The most important current concerns about CoC bearings are ceramic fracture and squeaking55). Ceramic fracture may occur when excessive load is partially applied.…”
Section: The New Bearingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of early CoC bearing was initial acetabular fixation, thus CoC bearings have become tremendously popularized by newly developed CoC that employ modular design with metal acetabular shell in the early 2000s. The most important current concerns about CoC bearings are ceramic fracture and squeaking55). Ceramic fracture may occur when excessive load is partially applied.…”
Section: The New Bearingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a reduced rate of complications was observed in a study by Migaud et al [25] that assessed CoC-THA via the DAA. Notably, no dislocation was observed in their cohort at a mid-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Polyethylene wear debris and subsequent pro‐inflammatory host response have historically been the main causes for periprosthestic osteolysis and aseptic prosthesis loosening, representing the most common revision reasons among metal‐on‐polyethylene (MoP) or ceramic‐on‐polyethylene (CoP) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) . As a measure to improve wear properties of conventional ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight‐polyethylene (UHMWPE), the introduction of highly crosslinked UHMWPE reduced the in vivo wear rate and decreased the revision rate of THA .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyethylene wear debris and subsequent pro-inflammatory host response have historically been the main causes for periprosthestic osteolysis and aseptic prosthesis loosening, representing the most common revision reasons among metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). 1,2 As a measure to improve wear properties of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE), the introduction of highly crosslinked UHMWPE reduced the in vivo wear rate 3,4 and decreased the revision rate of THA. 5,6 However, studies continued showing the proinflammatory effects of wear generated polyethylene particles dependent on their amount, size, and shape 7,8 and raising lingering concerns regarding the long-term risks of osteolysis-or wear-related revision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%