dIn an effort to maximize outcomes, recent expert guidelines recommend more-intensive vancomycin dosing schedules to maintain vancomycin troughs between 15 and 20 mg/liter. The widespread use of these more-intensive regimens has been associated with an increase in vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to determine the nephrotoxicity potential of maintaining higher troughs in clinical practice. All studies pertaining to vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity between 1996 and April 2012 were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry, and Medline databases and analyzed according to Cochrane guidelines. Of the initial 240 studies identified, 38 were reviewed, and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, higher troughs (>15 mg/liter) were associated with increased odds of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio [OR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95 to 3.65) relative to lower troughs of <15 mg/liter. The relationship between a trough of >15 mg/liter and nephrotoxicity persisted when the analysis was restricted to studies that examined only initial trough concentrations (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.81 to 5.37). The relationship between troughs of >15 mg/liter and nephrotoxicity persisted after adjustment for covariates known to independently increase the risk of a nephrotoxicity event. An incremental increase in nephrotoxicity was also observed with longer durations of vancomycin administration. Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity was reversible in the majority of cases, with short-term dialysis required only in 3% of nephrotoxic episodes. The collective literature indicates that an exposure-nephrotoxicity relationship for vancomycin exists. The probability of a nephrotoxic event increased as a function of the trough concentration and duration of therapy.
Since its discovery in the 1950s, vancomycin has been a mainstay of therapy for serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Although vancomycin was a second-line therapy early in its life cycle, it emerged as a first-line agent for infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in the 1970s (1). Over the next several decades, its usage dramatically increased due to the explosion of MRSA in both the community and health care settings (2-4). Despite the recent availability of alternative agents, vancomycin still remains the treatment of choice for serious MRSA infections (5).Despite its widespread use, there are growing concerns about the future role of vancomycin, particularly among patients who have invasive MRSA infections with vancomycin MICs of Ͼ1 mg/ liter (6). Although host-and pathogen-related factors have been implicated as a cause, suboptimal vancomycin dosing has been suggested as an alternative explanation for the poorer outcomes among these patients. To counteract some of these concerns and to maximize the likelihood of achieving a 24-h ratio of area under the curve to MIC (AUC/MIC) of greater than 400, expert guidelines now recommend more-intensive vancomycin dosing and maintenan...