The search for replicable markers -biological, psycho logical, social or their combinations -for psychiatric ill nesses carries on. In psychosis, attention has been directed to atrisk and firstepisode populations, given the possibility that following markers in young people will avoid the con founds of chronicity and exposure to pharmacological treat ments. A variety of promising biomarkers have been evalu ated, but few have passed through the rigorous screens of broader replication and demonstrated clinical utility.
1,2We argue in this editorial that such difficulties are unsur prising, given the construction of current studies and the fact that such disorders typically develop in adolescence and young adulthood. This "critical period" 3 for risk and onset of major youth mental illnesses, such as psychosis, coincides with deeply interlaced neurobiological, clinical, affective and cognitive development, not to mention profound changes in social interactions and exposures. We explore the implica tions of this backdrop, including how it should inform both the search for biomarkers and the design of future studies.
Critical periods, neurobiology and mental healthAdolescence to early adulthood, the age range when the early course of psychotic illness is most likely to emerge, is a win dow in which much is dynamic. At a neurobiological level, this includes neurons and synapses, neurotransmission, tro phic factors and longterm potentiation, among other phe nomena.4 However, it is also a period of sexual maturation, exposure to novel social and physical environments, different forms of stress, new models and contexts for learning, and de veloping cognitive abilities, reasoning and affective states.
5Whether adaptive or maladaptive, changes in brain structure and function are believed to occur in response to these inter nal and external stimuli and demands. For example, the fre quency and type of stressful life events change as children enter adolescence; 6 with these changes come further altera tions in neurobiology that may denote increased sensitization to such stimuli.7 If more persistently dysregulated during a critical window, the longterm setpoints of neurobiological processes or pathways may become distorted. Neurodevelop ment that results from interactions between endogenous neu robiological elements and exogenous environmental factors could thus profoundly alter brain processes, leading to differ ential trajectories and clinical outcomes.