Do we really need to extend syntax for advanced modularity?

Chiba, Shigeru; Horie, Michihiro; Kanazawa, Kei; Takeyama, Fuminobu; Teramoto, Yuuki

doi:10.1145/2162049.2162061

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is important to search solutions from both side. For example, clones with minor differences can be managed by synchronized editing [4]. It can be extended to support grouping clones, which corresponds to our family inheritance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feature-oriented programming with family polymorphism

Takeyama

Chiba

2012

Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Variability &Amp; Composition - VariComp '12

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In feature-oriented programming (FOP), code clones are also important issue. Although an approach called a software product line (SPL) enables to implement products efficiently by reusing most of their code, SPLs implemented by FOP contain a lot of code clones. Code clones are often caused by alternative features and we also found clones in derivatives among alternative features. To resolve this problem, we propose a new FOP language named FeatureGluonJ, which supports family polymorphism with revisers. The code clones among alternative features are separated into another feature and can be shared among the alternative features by extending that feature. Furthermore, clones in derivatives can be removed as well.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feature-oriented programming with family polymorphism

Takeyama

Chiba

2012

Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Variability &Amp; Composition - VariComp '12

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As can be expected, simple visualization techniques like color or icon and simple data (boolean, fixed enumeration) were used more often than complex visualizations of complex data that are much harder to design and implement. Graphical visualizations are also rarely used [84] 2017 ArchEvol [49] 2009 ASIDE [102] 2011 Aspect Browser [60] 2001 ATCoPE [54] 2012 BeneFactor [103] 2012 Cares [76] 2012 CeDAR [77] 2012 ChangeCommander [89] 2008 Cheetah [104] 2017 CIDE [48] 2008 Clepsydra [56] 2007 CloneTracker [24] 2007 CnP [36] 2010 Code Bubbles [101] 2010 Code Orb [105] 2011 Code portals [79] 2016 CodeBasket [68] 2015 CodeGraffiti [90] 2014 Codelink [106] 2004 CodeMend [66] 2016 CoderChrome [14] 2010 CodeTalk [107] 2010 Collabode [41] 2011 CoRED [108] 2012 CostHat [23] 2016 CSeR [37] 2010 CSIclipse [86] 2015 CssCoco [109] 2016 Debugger Canvas [110] 2012 Diver [82] 2010 DrScheme [75] 2002 DSketch [69] 2010 Dynamic text [111] 2012 Eclipse PTP [22] 2006 EG [112] 2004 eMoose [61] 2009 EnergyDebugger [88] 2016 Error notifications [74] 2014 FeatureIDE [51] 2016 Featureous [87] ...…”

Section: Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual augmentation of source code editors: A systematic mapping study

Sulír

Bacikova

Chodarev

et al. 2018

Journal of Visual Languages & Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

c 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This is the accepted version of: M. Sulír, M. Bačíková, S. Chodarev, J. Porubän. Visual augmentation of source code editors: A systematic mapping study. AbstractSource code written in textual programming languages is typically edited in integrated development environments or specialized code editors. These tools often display various visual items, such as icons, color highlights or more advanced graphical overlays directly in the main editable source code view. We call such visualizations source code editor augmentation.In this paper, we present a first systematic mapping study of source code editor augmentation tools and approaches. We manually reviewed the metadata of 5,553 articles published during the last twenty years in two phases -keyword search and references search. The result is a list of 103 relevant articles and a taxonomy of source code editor augmentation tools with seven dimensions, which we used to categorize the resulting list of the surveyed articles.We also provide the definition of the term source code editor augmentation, along with a brief overview of historical development and augmentations available in current industrial IDEs.

show abstract

“…In the GPL context, this idea is not new. Chiba et al [42] use IDE to introduce language syntax extension -e.g., they implemented the Kide editor that creates virtual source files by showing together several related pieces of code from multiple source files. Virtual source files can be used to put together code implementing crosscutting concerns, but instead of doing so on the static textual level (AspectJ), Kide does it on the presentation level in the IDE.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%