Do We Report the Information That Is Necessary to Give Psychology Away? A Scoping Review of the Psychological Intervention Literature 2000–2018

Abstract

Psychologists are spending a considerable amount of time researching and developing interventions in hopes that their efforts can help to tackle some of society’s pressing problems. Unfortunately, those hopes are often not realized—many interventions are developed and reported in journals but do not make their way into the broader world they were designed to change. One potential reason for this is that there may be a gap between the information reported in articles and the information others, such as practitioners, need to implement the findings. We explored this possibility in the current article. We conducted a scoping review to assess the extent to which the information needed for implementation is reported in psychological intervention articles. Results suggest psychological intervention articles report, at most, 64% of the information needed to implement interventions. We discuss the implications of this for both psychological theories and applying them in the world.

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…More comprehensive evaluations, including assessments of actual behaviours (rather than intentions) and health outcomes, are necessary to determine whether there are any additional benefits or unintended consequences of the interventions. Finally, before implementing reappraisal interventions for practice, more research is needed to better evaluate the intervention (for example, via formal cost-benefit analysis and/or using the 'reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation and maintenance' framework 106,107 ).…”

Studying Science Inequities: How to Use Surveys to Study Diverse Populations

“…While it is beyond the scope of the current article to discuss the concomitant challenge of aligning academic incentives (e.g., tenure/promotion) with pursuing such work, one positive step would come from diversifying institutional leadership to represent and reflect the experiences of diverse populations. Another fruitful step is for scholars who test interventions to provide relevant information in their work; indeed, Premachandra and Lewis (2021) find that more than 35 percent of psychological intervention papers do not provide the necessary information for carrying out the interventions.…”

Positive behavioural support for children and young people with developmental disabilities in special education settings: A systematic review

“…Although there is a wider literature on PBS in special and alternative There are currently no official standards for reporting PBS interventions in research, and many of the studies included in the current review lacked information on whether certain characteristics of PBS were present. The generally poor reporting of details for psychological interventions (Premachandra & Lewis, 2021)…”