2016
DOI: 10.1080/1743727x.2016.1181163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we see through their eyes? Testing a bilingual questionnaire in education research using cognitive interviews

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purposeful maximum variation sampling was deemed necessary in order to elicit underrepresented and historically excluded perspectives in regard to race, gender, and neurotype (cf. Sopromadze & Moorosi, 2016; Upadhyay & Lipkovich, 2020). Specifically, we utilized a combination of our personal and professional social networks to intentionally invite up to 19 SLPs1 who varied in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, U.S. geography, work setting, neurotype, and anticipated perspective of autism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Purposeful maximum variation sampling was deemed necessary in order to elicit underrepresented and historically excluded perspectives in regard to race, gender, and neurotype (cf. Sopromadze & Moorosi, 2016; Upadhyay & Lipkovich, 2020). Specifically, we utilized a combination of our personal and professional social networks to intentionally invite up to 19 SLPs1 who varied in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, U.S. geography, work setting, neurotype, and anticipated perspective of autism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators were encouraged to ask follow-up questions as needed for clarity or elaboration, but few were needed. In line with other similar studies (e.g., Sopromadze & Moorosi, 2016; Upadhyay & Lipkovich, 2020), sessions were not recorded to help ensure participant comfort and confidentiality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day 1 covered preinterview preparation (Sands et al, 2007). On Day 1, interviewers were trained on: what information was needed and what to ask the research team for before each interview, biases that may distort responses (Aronson Fontes, 2009), and information on the cultural and linguistic contexts of the interviews (Sopromadze & Moorosi, 2017). Day 2 focused on “during-interview barriers” (Sands et al, 2007): developing rapport and conveying respect (Aronson Fontes, 2009), nonverbal communication (Aronson Fontes, 2009), postinterview notes, and practice interviews with each research site’s specific FT interview guide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collection spanned two months, from August to September 2023, employing questionnaires (Sopromadze & Moorosi, 2017) and interviews (Adhabi & Anozie, 2017;Rahayu et al, 2022). The questionnaires, consisting of 20 items shared online, served as versatile tools to gather information on teachers' experiences with ICT.…”
Section: Instruments and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%