1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90076-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we understand IBM parameters?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where q/l/2 = 5-1/2(/1 II r2y (2) 11/2), (9) and the quadrupole operator Q}~FA of the IBFA. As discussed in ref.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q/l/2 = 5-1/2(/1 II r2y (2) 11/2), (9) and the quadrupole operator Q}~FA of the IBFA. As discussed in ref.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the special choice of effective nucleon inter actions seems to lead to implicit consideration of non collective phonons. These were explicitly considered within IBM2 in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the image of d-bosons we employ the quadrupole phonons of MQRPA with the lowest energy. As shown by IBM2 [16] and our [12] calculations, in order to obtain the realistic values of IBM parameters one has to renormalize them, taking into account the connection of the collective D-phonon or d-boson space with phonons of higher energies and angular momenta L≥2. So all calculations here for Xe isotopes and in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%