2017
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do women offered assisted reproduction technologies have a higher incidence of gynecologic cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The last two decades have seen an increase in the number of women diagnosed with infertility. The consequent growth in the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) calls for the determination of its long-term effects, including the risk of cancer. Many studies have attempted to answer this question, albeit with contradictory results. This review aimed to assess whether assisted reproductive technologies are associated with an increased risk of gynecological cancer. A search for papers in the literature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic reviews have included at most 70 753 treated women for analyses of breast cancer risk, 10 79 143 for ovarian cancer risk, 16 and 118 320 for analysis of all gynaecological cancer risk. 37 Our study comprised over 250 000 treated women, including almost 65 000 person years of follow-up for at least 15 years beyond last treatment with an average follow-up of 8.8 years and a maximum follow-up of 19 years (table S2, supplementary appendix). However, we cannot exclude the possibility of different risk profiles for any studied cancer on longer follow-up, at ages when most reproductive related cancers occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews have included at most 70 753 treated women for analyses of breast cancer risk, 10 79 143 for ovarian cancer risk, 16 and 118 320 for analysis of all gynaecological cancer risk. 37 Our study comprised over 250 000 treated women, including almost 65 000 person years of follow-up for at least 15 years beyond last treatment with an average follow-up of 8.8 years and a maximum follow-up of 19 years (table S2, supplementary appendix). However, we cannot exclude the possibility of different risk profiles for any studied cancer on longer follow-up, at ages when most reproductive related cancers occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews have included at most 70 753 treated women for analyses of breast cancer risk, 10 79 143 for ovarian cancer risk, 16 and 118 320 for analysis of all gynaecological cancer risk. 37 Our study comprised over 250 000 treated women, including almost 65 000 person years of follow-up for at least 15 years beyond last treatment with an average follow-up of 8.8 years and a maximum follow-up of 19 years (table S2, supplementary appendix). However, we cannot exclude the possibility of different risk profiles for any studied cancer on longer follow-up, at ages when most reproductive related cancers occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%