Do Workers Discriminate against Female Bosses?

Abstract

Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.

Female Leadership and Workplace Climate

“…However, female employees judge workplace conditions much worse than their male colleagues when they do not receive support from their female leaders. These findings are consistent with Abel (2022), who show that negative feedback by female managers decreases job satisfaction and the perceived importance of the task significantly. They are also consistent with evidence from Grossman et al (2019) or Chakraborty and Serra (2022) about female leaders receiving more backlash or being less positively assessed than men.…”

Challenges of Change: An Experiment Promoting Women to Managerial Roles in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector

“…Do lines managed by the female trainees initially underperform because the female trainees are less skilled than the male trainees (lower µ), or because workers bestow less "authority" on the female supervisors, as captured by φ in our framework (Abel (2019); Ayalew et al (2018); Grossman et al (2016))? The combination of few objective skill differences and strong negative baseline beliefs about the supervisory skills of women provides prima facie evidence that beliefs are misaligned.…”

“…4 Recent lab experiments show that workers pay less attention to advice provided by supervisors who are framed as being female, resulting in lower output (Ayalew et al (2018); Grossman et al (2016)). Similarly, Abel (2019) shows that workers lose more motivation on, and satisfaction with, a job after negative feedback from supervisors who are framed as female.…”

How status‐group power differentials shape age discrimination within U.S. federal agencies: Evidence from EEOC formal complaint filings, 2010–2019

“…13 These standardized marginal effect incidence rate ratios are computed as exp (β À1). 14 Experimental evidence finds that women managers experience twice the negative effects from critical feedback administered to nonsupervisors compared to men counterparts (Abel, 2019). 15 An analysis of these data reveals that the proportion of supervisors who are women is both substantively and statistically larger than that of minority supervisors (Mean Women Proportion = 0.388, Mean Minority Proportion = 0.295; t-statistic = 14.60, p < .0001).…”