1999
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.1999.319751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do You Need More than One Manager for a Given Equity Style?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finance theory would suggest that by holding a portfolio of funds with different managers, poor performance by one manager can be offset by another's good performance. Along these lines, Fant and O'Neal (1999) document substantial risk reduction benefits associated with diversification across fund managers. Although a similar diversification argument can be made at the fund company level, holding different companies' funds may also expand the range of investment opportunities.…”
Section: Management Structure and Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finance theory would suggest that by holding a portfolio of funds with different managers, poor performance by one manager can be offset by another's good performance. Along these lines, Fant and O'Neal (1999) document substantial risk reduction benefits associated with diversification across fund managers. Although a similar diversification argument can be made at the fund company level, holding different companies' funds may also expand the range of investment opportunities.…”
Section: Management Structure and Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The in vest ment ac tivi ties of pen sion funds in the stock mar ket showed that (i) trus tees of pen sion funds give man date to pro fes sional in vest ment man ag ers to man age their ac tive in vest ments (Kum ples and McCrae, 1999), and (ii) that trus tees of me dium and large pension funds con tinue to use more than one in vest ment man ager (Fant and O'Neal, 1999;Ennis, 1997). Many re searches have largely con cen trated on the per form ance of the pen sion funds (Kum ples and McCrae, 1999), the per form ance of in vest ment man ag ers (Brown, Drap per and McKen zie, 1997), and the per form ance of mu tual funds (Chevaliuer and El lison, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%