2003
DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do You See What I See? Effects of Group Consciousness on African American Women's Attributions to Prejudice

Abstract: This study examined the effects of three types of group consciousness among African American women (ethnic, feminist, and womanist) on prejudice attributions and appraised personal significance (centrality) of a negative intergroup event. African American female college students (N = 123) imagined themselves in an audiotaped scenario in which they overheard two European American male classmates make negative evaluations of them. The scenario provided no cause for the negative evaluations and no references to r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(134 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rated perceived sexism as more stressful than women who did not identify as feminist with their sample of racially and ethnically diverse women (sexual orientation not reported). Similarly, African American college student women who endorsed womanism were more likely to appraise a negative intergroup interaction (e.g., prejudice event) as personally relevant (King, 2003). Because stressors appraised as more personally relevant are better predictors of emotion (e.g., anger, anxiety, sadness; Smith, Haynes, Lazarus, & Pope, 1993), King (2003) inferred that women with higher womanism identity would report greater levels of stress associated with their awareness of multiple discrimination experiences and inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rated perceived sexism as more stressful than women who did not identify as feminist with their sample of racially and ethnically diverse women (sexual orientation not reported). Similarly, African American college student women who endorsed womanism were more likely to appraise a negative intergroup interaction (e.g., prejudice event) as personally relevant (King, 2003). Because stressors appraised as more personally relevant are better predictors of emotion (e.g., anger, anxiety, sadness; Smith, Haynes, Lazarus, & Pope, 1993), King (2003) inferred that women with higher womanism identity would report greater levels of stress associated with their awareness of multiple discrimination experiences and inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have established that even infrequent or minor occurrences of racial discrimination may result in diminished psychological well-being (Klonoff and Landrine 1995), lowered self-esteem (King 2003), and higher depressive symptoms, anger, problem behaviors, and psychiatric symptoms (e.g., Fisher et al 2000; Greene et al 2006; Sanders-Phillips 2009), as well as lower academic motivation and achievement (e.g., Chavous et al 2008; Wong et al 2003). …”
Section: Racial Discrimination Experiences Of African American Girls mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a member of a marginalized group believes that she has personally experienced discrimination (or if she thinks that institutional practices continue to treat her group unfairly), this too is likely to prompt a form of dissatisfaction with the current or future state of group relations that increases the attractiveness of nationalist ideologies. There is some evidence of this, for recent studies confirm a link between feelings of group identification and political exclusion and sentiments of group consciousness among Asians and Latinos (see Chong and Kim 2008;Sanchez 2008) and women (Foster 1999;King 2003). More research should be done to determine how generalizable the disillusionment and linked hypotheses are to the study of ethnic and gender nationalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%