2001
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.20.2.147.22260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do You See What I See?: Facial Attractiveness and Weight Preoccupation in College Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, from an applied perspective, the question of how the health and attractiveness of others is rated may also have potential implications for the development of problematic eating. Recent research has supported the hypothesis that facial attractiveness is related to weight preoccupation in young Caucasian women (Davis, Claridge, & Fox, 2000;Davis, Shuster, Dionne, & Claridge, 2001). Davis et al (2000Davis et al ( , 2001 found that females who are perceived by others as more attractive are, themselves, more weight preoccupied, independent of neurotic perfectionism and body weight.…”
Section: Appearance I Body Image I Body Shape I Ethnicity I Gendermentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, from an applied perspective, the question of how the health and attractiveness of others is rated may also have potential implications for the development of problematic eating. Recent research has supported the hypothesis that facial attractiveness is related to weight preoccupation in young Caucasian women (Davis, Claridge, & Fox, 2000;Davis, Shuster, Dionne, & Claridge, 2001). Davis et al (2000Davis et al ( , 2001 found that females who are perceived by others as more attractive are, themselves, more weight preoccupied, independent of neurotic perfectionism and body weight.…”
Section: Appearance I Body Image I Body Shape I Ethnicity I Gendermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recent research has supported the hypothesis that facial attractiveness is related to weight preoccupation in young Caucasian women (Davis, Claridge, & Fox, 2000;Davis, Shuster, Dionne, & Claridge, 2001). Davis et al (2000Davis et al ( , 2001 found that females who are perceived by others as more attractive are, themselves, more weight preoccupied, independent of neurotic perfectionism and body weight. In a follow-up to these findings, Colabianchi, Ievers-Landis, and Borawski (2006) examined whether this finding would hold when the attractiveness of the whole individual rather than the face in isolation was considered.…”
Section: Appearance I Body Image I Body Shape I Ethnicity I Gendermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study that examined the role of peer status regarding physical attractiveness in the development of eating pathology. Studies using older samples of adolescent females (Colabianchi, Ievers‐Landis, & Borawski, ) or female college students (Davis, Claridge, & Fox, ; Davis, Shuster, Dionne, & Claridge, ) found that higher objective ratings of physical attractiveness were correlated with higher levels of weight preoccupation cross‐sectionally. Davis et al () used a narrow definition of physical attractiveness, exclusively rating facial attractiveness and not other factors such as weight, clothes or accessories; factors that may be of importance in peers’ judgements about attractiveness (Ashmore, Solomon, & Longo, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women who are perceived to meet cultural standards of physical attractiveness often suffer from the negative consequences of self-objectification (e.g., Davis et al 2001). Therefore, participants' perceptions of the target's priorities, rather than their perceptions of her success at achieving the goals implied by these priorities (which would have been reflected in their responses to the questions), are expected to underlie the predicted effects.…”
Section: Procedures and Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%