2016
DOI: 10.7764/res.2016.39.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doble articulación y ciencias cognitivas de tercera generación: desafiando las nociones tradicionales en torno a la experiencia musical acusmática

Abstract: ResumenEn este artículo caracterizamos la música acusmática en tanto modo de producción y modalidad de representación acústica, en función de lo cual establecemos un conjunto de condiciones que definen su práctica y ethos particular desde un enfoque fundamentalmente pragmático y cognitivo. Damos cuenta de una de las críticas más relevantes a las músicas contemporáneas y analizamos el prejuicio intelectual que subyacería a esas críticas. Proponemos, hacia el final, una analogía entre la reacción de la ciencia c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional perspective in that regard has been the consideration of the perceptive and cognitive dimensions associated with the listening situation enabled by the electroacoustic device (Küpper 1988; Smalley 2007; Alexander 2007; Kendall and Ardila 2008; Kendall 2010), which – given the acousmatic music composer’s simultaneous condition of producer and listener – are relevant for the use of these variables during the composition of the piece. The articles of Kendall (2010) and Smalley (2007) are of particular interest, and their formulations are fairly close to some models inspired by cognitive linguistics (Schumacher and Fuentes 2016).…”
Section: Introduction: Eppure è Musicamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional perspective in that regard has been the consideration of the perceptive and cognitive dimensions associated with the listening situation enabled by the electroacoustic device (Küpper 1988; Smalley 2007; Alexander 2007; Kendall and Ardila 2008; Kendall 2010), which – given the acousmatic music composer’s simultaneous condition of producer and listener – are relevant for the use of these variables during the composition of the piece. The articles of Kendall (2010) and Smalley (2007) are of particular interest, and their formulations are fairly close to some models inspired by cognitive linguistics (Schumacher and Fuentes 2016).…”
Section: Introduction: Eppure è Musicamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At this point, it is important to consider that concrete–acousmatic music was the first to systematically make use of spatial variables or spatialisation , in both the production mode and the acoustic performance of the piece (Schumacher and Fuentes 2016). The aforementioned is reflected by an abundant literature that mainly addresses the use of the space linked to syntactic aspects involved throughout the production mode (the publications L’Espace du Son I , II and III published in 1988, 1991 and 2011, compiled by Francis Dhomont, summarise different approaches of composers in this regard).…”
Section: Introduction: Eppure è Musicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien el dispositivo de producción, de fijación y reproducción del sonido se ha generalizado al conjunto de la producción musical actual, el modo de producción en el cual opera el compositor concreto-acusmático (en adelante, compositor acusmático) sigue manteniendo ciertas singularidades que le son distintivas (Schumacher & Fuentes, 2016). Estas singularidades conforman un caso paradigmático de compositor inmerso en el SPM3, fundamentalmente por dos razones, a saber: porque de este género surge este sistema de producción, y porque sin este dispositivo la sola existencia de la acusmática en tanto género musical sería imposible.…”
Section: Antecedentes Teóricos Sistemas Modos Y Dispositivos De Producción Musicalunclassified