2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9752-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Docking with GemDock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E ligpre penalizes deviations from ligand preferences. This comprehensive approach helps differentiate active compounds, aiding in the selection of potential binding configurations [39] . The key concept of this evolutionary strategy is to create numerous operators that collaborate utilising a family competition model analogous to a local search approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E ligpre penalizes deviations from ligand preferences. This comprehensive approach helps differentiate active compounds, aiding in the selection of potential binding configurations [39] . The key concept of this evolutionary strategy is to create numerous operators that collaborate utilising a family competition model analogous to a local search approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comprehensive approach helps differentiate active compounds, aiding in the selection of potential binding configurations. [39] The key concept of this evolutionary strategy is to create numerous operators that collaborate utilising a family competition model analogous to a local search approach. For each hormone, iGemDock provides the interface and binding pocket within M pro of nCoV for the requisite interactions.…”
Section: Molecular Docking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Docking methods, meanwhile, offer a route to scan large numbers of molecules against target surfaces but are still not strongly developed for molecule–surface rather than molecule–protein systems and in the latter case are known to have significant limitations. 4–6 Consequently, there is a need for alternative methods that allow for rapid evaluation of the binding affinity of molecules to surfaces and screening for optimal adsorbate–adsorbent pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurately capturing all the underlying effects in a simple analytical model is not feasible 12 and thus we turn to a machine learning (ML) approach for prediction. Many groups have already approached the problem of the binding of ligands to specific targets using ML techniques, as well as the more general cases of the prediction of PMFs, potentials for complex systems or indeed entire forcefields, 4,13–19 suggesting this is a suitable methodology to apply to the prediction of molecule–surface adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%