2009
DOI: 10.1071/ah090268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctor and pharmacist — back to the apothecary!

Abstract: The Australian National Medicines Policy embodies four tenets: availability, quality, safety and efficacy of medicines; timely access to affordable medicines; quality use of medicines (QUM); and a responsible and viable medicines industry. The promotion of QUM requires a multidisciplinary approach, including contributions from government, the pharmaceutical industry, health professionals, consumers and academia. However, there are significant tensions and unintended effects associated with the multidisciplinar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation is not unique to eye care. Interprofessional tensions have been observed between GPs and nurses 17 and between doctors and pharmacists, 18 for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is not unique to eye care. Interprofessional tensions have been observed between GPs and nurses 17 and between doctors and pharmacists, 18 for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Pharmacists are amongst the most frequently visited, available and trusted health professionals in the community setting. [3][4][5][6] The accessibility of pharmacy for most consumers reinforces its potential to promote general community health, but also self-management and optimal use of medicines by those with chronic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years, the reprofessionalisation of the community pharmacy profession has seen an emphasis on raising awareness of the profession's expertise in medication management and CDM (Benrimoj & Frommer, 2004;Liaw & Peterson, 2009;Rieck & Pettigrew, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%