2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00141-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctor, can I drive with this plaster? An evidence based response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests of braking function are not applicable with upper extremity surgeries. Healthy patients driving on courses indicated that it is unsafe for patients with most forms of upper extremity immobilization to drive [6,7,20,21]. A driving simulator that includes avoiding obstacles could be a better method of evaluating driving ability than an isolated evaluation of braking function, as there is more to driving and avoiding accidents than accounting for the time it takes to press the brake pedal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Tests of braking function are not applicable with upper extremity surgeries. Healthy patients driving on courses indicated that it is unsafe for patients with most forms of upper extremity immobilization to drive [6,7,20,21]. A driving simulator that includes avoiding obstacles could be a better method of evaluating driving ability than an isolated evaluation of braking function, as there is more to driving and avoiding accidents than accounting for the time it takes to press the brake pedal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these articles discussed procedures that were not on our original list, one was not indexed in either database, one did not have driving as a primary focus, and the remaining six articles discussed driving with limb immobilization. Thirty-four articles had data relevant to our study Question 1 [1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 19, 22, 23, 26-30, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 45-50, 53, 55, 57, 60, 63, 64], eight had data relevant to Question 2 [2,6,7,17,20,21,43,46], and seven had data relevant to Question 3 [3,31,32,35,54,58,59] (Table 1). The range of MINORS scores for comparative studies was 17 to 24, and the range for noncomparative studies was 11 to 15.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations