It has long been recognized that public administration (PA) is a "prophet without a prophecy", a situation in which PA theories and research cannot predict, tell, explain, or solve the problems facing PA practitioners. Consequently, this problem has resulted in a lack of congruence, gap, disconnect, division, or gulf between PA academics and practitioners. Although volumes have been written about the problem, much of this work is based strictly on the "scientific" research method which has little or no potential relevance to the problems facing PA practitioners. In contrast, this paper uses both the scientific and the "case study" research methods to provide a more balanced view of the problem. To illustrate, after discussing the nature of the causes of the disconnect between PA academics and practitioners from a theoretical point of view, the discussion then applied a case study research method to show how the "theory-practice" and "research-practice" gaps might have contributed, directly or indirectly and in whole or in part, to the failure of the American anti-poverty programs, popularly known as the "American war on poverty". The paper concludes with some results-oriented and productive recommendations to bridge the theory-practice and the research-practice gaps in public administration, the disconnect between PA academics and practitioners, and to move the public administration profession in the right direction.