2010
DOI: 10.1177/097172180901500105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctoral Research Environment in an Indian Institute of Higher Learning in Science and Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past decade in particular has seen a steady increase in research activity aimed at bettering our understanding of the doctoral student experience. A range of factors are likely responsible for this development, including the increased understanding of research's importance to national competitiveness (Gupta, 2010), governmental attempts to regulate and audit doctoral learning processes (Brooks & Heiland, 2007), marked increases in doctoral student numbers and demographic heterogeneity (Barker, 2011;Nettles, 1990;Ulku-Steiner, Kurtz-Costes, & Kinlaw, 2000), funding constraints (Neumann, 2007), and ongoing concerns regarding the frequently high rates of attrition reported amongst doctoral students (Gardner, 2009b;Golde, 2005).…”
Section: The Contemporary Doctoral Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decade in particular has seen a steady increase in research activity aimed at bettering our understanding of the doctoral student experience. A range of factors are likely responsible for this development, including the increased understanding of research's importance to national competitiveness (Gupta, 2010), governmental attempts to regulate and audit doctoral learning processes (Brooks & Heiland, 2007), marked increases in doctoral student numbers and demographic heterogeneity (Barker, 2011;Nettles, 1990;Ulku-Steiner, Kurtz-Costes, & Kinlaw, 2000), funding constraints (Neumann, 2007), and ongoing concerns regarding the frequently high rates of attrition reported amongst doctoral students (Gardner, 2009b;Golde, 2005).…”
Section: The Contemporary Doctoral Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%