This paper uses a self-assessment questionnaire (IL-HUMASS) with a wide sample of university students. The questionnaire puts forward a scale of attitudes that aim to measure "belief in importance" and "skills self-assessment" regarding diverse information competences. We use a group of twenty-six information sub-competences gathered in four categories (searching, evaluation, processing and communication-dissemination). The results show some considerable differences in these categories when statistically comparing seventeen university degrees related to five branches of knowledge. It is proved that attitudes appreciably vary between branches, in reverse relation with the interdisciplinary differences we have found. An improvement regarding students' informational attitudes will help reduce the interdisciplinary differences. The results of this case study suggest the feasibility of shared training actions for some information competences in the branches of Sciences, Engineering & Architecture, and Health Sciences. The branches of Arts & Humanities and Social & Legal Sciences show considerable widespread attitudinal differences that advise against that shared training. Keywords: Information Literacy, self-assessment, interdisciplinarity, empirical study, case study.
IntroductionThe knowledge of the University of Granada (Spain) on the levels of information competence of its students is highly limited. The situation is indeed similar in most universities in Spain. This is certainly due to the poor relevance that institutions give to Information Literacy training. Nonetheless this scene is changing, and a new awareness, both individual and collective, on the relevance of Information Literacy is arising.A first approach aiming to learn about the Information Literacy levels of our students should not be a sort of traumatic process in which, suddenly, they discover and describe their evident lack of information competence. Instead, it would be preferable to undertake this process so that it may ease the discovery of the poor levels that actually our students have. In the case of Spain, we may assume these poor information competence levels due to the limited training developed in this field. Thus, we think that a first approach to the students should be subjective, trying to diagnose not their levels of knowledge but their attitudes and self-perceptions regarding Information Literacy. That would mean the assessment of the self-perceived competences, which could be an interesting starting point for subsequent objective assessments. Learning about the students' subjective perception of their knowledge would be useful for the development of training proposals, taking into account the subjective components of learning, and the fact that the border between learning and assessment is becoming more and more blurred.If we agree that students from different disciplines usually have different informational attitudes, we need an initial diagnostic self-assessment that could report on their attitudes towards information c...