Student perspectives on the transmission of integration in integrative programs were examined through a qualitative study. Participants in the study were 595 graduate and undergraduate students (305 women and 247 men) drawn from four Evangelical Christian institutions of higher education. Participants provided written data in response to three open-ended questions, inquiring about the exemplary and helpful aspects of their educational experiences with respect to integration. Post-hoc content analyses informed by grounded theory analytic processes were used to analyze the data, resulting in two overarching themes: Facilitating Integration, and Concepts of Integration, which respectively address how students learn integration, and how students conceptualize integration. The implications for the conceptualization of integration and for the pedagogy of facilitating integration are explored. 15 that this learning occurs "through relational attachments with mentors who model that integration for students personally" (p. 363).The current study built on Sorensen's work on the influence of professors on the learning of integration. In his work, "integration," or more accurately, integration learning, was operationalized as "how exemplary and helpful the professor was for the student's own integrative pilgrimage" (Sorensen, 1997, p. 8). These two characteristics, exemplary and helpful, were derived from student focus groups on how they evaluated faculty. The open-ended survey questions in the current study built on Sorensen's work in two ways. First, by leaving the questions open-ended rather than focusing on faculty, the questions allowed the researchers to discover whether students found factors other than the personal characteristics of the professors helpful to the learning of integration. Secondly, the questions helped to flesh out what students found "exemplary" and "helpful," both in the professors, and in other influences on learning integration.
METHOD
ParticipantsParticipants in the study were 595 graduate and undergraduate students drawn from four Evangelical . Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
16Native American, and 15%, Other. The majority of students, 88%, were full-time graduate students and 95% were on-campus as opposed to distance-learning students. Totals do not add to 100% due to some non-response to items. Disciplines represented include Law (37.5%), Counseling and Psychology (25.5%), Communication (4.7%), Theology (2.4%), Business (18%), and Education (18%). Religious affiliation of the students was varied with the highest number identifying as some type of Baptist (25.5%), followed by those that indicated they were non-denominational (22.2%), Evangelical (8.6%), Catholic (6.6%), Presbyterian (5.7%), Methodist (4.4%), Assembly of God (4.2%), and Pentecostal (4%). The remaining identities listed varied with less than 10 per group. There were only two people who indicated a religion other than Christian: one Hindu and one Mormon. Media...