2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctoral supervision as an academic practice and leader–member relationship: A critical approach to relationship dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 This indicates the difference in the discourse models of supervision between the two Indonesian contexts. Overall, we have demonstrated that although the supervisors' discourse models of supervision emanate from shared ideals about promoting dialogue and students' intellectual development (Mahmood et al, 2019;Ugrin et al, 2008;Vähämäki et al, 2021), these supervisors face different tensions and dilemmas in enacting these models, depending on their context. Arguably, the supervision practice must be situated in its context to be explicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 This indicates the difference in the discourse models of supervision between the two Indonesian contexts. Overall, we have demonstrated that although the supervisors' discourse models of supervision emanate from shared ideals about promoting dialogue and students' intellectual development (Mahmood et al, 2019;Ugrin et al, 2008;Vähämäki et al, 2021), these supervisors face different tensions and dilemmas in enacting these models, depending on their context. Arguably, the supervision practice must be situated in its context to be explicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Research on the supervisory relationship has stressed the necessity for collaborative supervision styles that entail both collaboration between the supervisor and the student and the student's knowledge-based research improvement. A strong and supportive collaborative supervisory relationship facilitates students achieving their goals, creates trust in feedback, stimulates students' creativity and innovation, empowers students, and boosts their self-esteem, all of which improves student performance (Mahmood et al, 2019;Ugrin et al, 2008;Vähämäki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academic interactions during the defense of undergraduate theses, students' responses to lecturers' questions indicate compliance and acceptance. Similarly, Vähämäki et al, (2021) discovered an unbalanced relationship between a supervisor and his students contextualized as a leader-follower relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin (2017) found the characteristics of interactional discourse in the examiner-promotendus relationship in a dissertation defense session. Vähämäki et al, (2021) discovered a similar unequal relationship between supervisors and students contextualized in their respective roles as leaders and followers. In addition, the findings of (Wang, 2021) revealed unequal power relations in Chinese universities, which placed students in a subordinate position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Brockman et al [31] believe that the relationship between doctoral students and faculty members is a crucial determinant in the quality of postgraduate experience. The common understanding between supervisors and students is important for the well-being of doctoral students, and the expectation conflictions between the students and supervisors are regarded as one obstacle to the effective completion of the doctoral research [32]. The continuous destructive friction between students and the learning environment can lead to learning problems, and mental pain during education can have a negative impact and lead to withdrawal from learning [33].…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%