2004
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.97.8.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctors' confusion over ratios and percentages in drug solutions: the case for standard labelling

Abstract: SUMMARYThe different ways of expressing concentrations of drugs in solution, as ratios or percentages or mass per unit volume, are a potential cause of confusion that may contribute to dose errors. To assess doctors' understanding of what they signify, all active subscribers to doctors.net.uk, an online community exclusively for UK doctors, were invited to complete a brief web-based multiple-choice questionnaire that explored their familiarity with solutions of adrenaline (expressed as a ratio), lidocaine (exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
25
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There had been 2975 participants in the original study (1); the response rate was 24.6%. The study population did not differ significantly from the medical workforce on the basis of specialty (p = 0.29), age (p > 0.999) or seniority (p > 0.999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There had been 2975 participants in the original study (1); the response rate was 24.6%. The study population did not differ significantly from the medical workforce on the basis of specialty (p = 0.29), age (p > 0.999) or seniority (p > 0.999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.Doctors.net.uk is an internet service and content provider based in the UK and aimed exclusively at doctors. Subscribers had been invited to participate in an online survey of drug administration skills in 2003 (1). The invitation included information that answers would be recorded, that anonymity would be maintained, and data of interest published; however, written consent was not obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations