Doctors' responses to patients' concerns; an exploration of communication sequences in gynaecology

Abstract

SUMMARY. Aims -Like other medical doctors, gynaecologists have difficulty attending to psychosocial issues and concerns. Communication training has proven to be effective in teaching them to spend more time on discussing these factors. However, whether or not they do this in response to patients' utterances remains unclear. The question is how gynaecologists respond to patients' concerns, whether or not they do this adequately and what the effects of a communication training are on the use of these communication sequences. Methods -Nineteen gynaecologists participated in a study which examined the effects of a three-day residential communication training. Before and after the training the gynaecologists videotaped series of consecutive outpatient visits. The communication during these visits was rated using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Gynaecologists' responses to patients' concerns were examined at lag one, i.e. immediately following the patient's concern. Results -The most prevalent responses made by the gynaecologists were showing agreement and understanding and giving medical information. Affective responses were observed less. At postmeasurement, the gynaecologists responded neither more adequately nor inadequately to patients' concerns. Conclusions -The gynaecologists did not respond in a very affective way to patients' concerns. However, the patients did not express many concerns. Future studies should focus on more prevalent communication behaviours and incorporate more lags.Declaration of Interest: none.

Communication at an online infertility expert forum: provider responses to patients’ emotional and informational cues

“…Third, overall, professionals gave adequate responses to patients' informational and -to a somewhat lesser extentemotional cues. This echoes the pattern seen in face-to-face patient-provider interactions in oncology [12,14] and other gynecological settings [30]. However, the responses to emotional cues in these real-life settings were merely facilitations, such as expressing understanding (e.g.…”

Interactive and evaluative correlates of dialogue sequence: A simulation study applying the RIAS to turn taking structures

“…Others have also explored the reciprocal nature of turn content from perspectives outside of conversational analysis using more quantitative approaches or qualitative and quantitative hybrids. These include a series of studies using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] or other coding strategies [14] to relate patient expressions of concern or question asking to empathic or supportive physician statements.…”

Five years of EACH (European Association for Communication in Healthcare)

“…Given the topics of EACH committee members' most recent publications, new areas of interest include, for instance, the role of the broader context in which a problem is presented [11], unconventional outcome measures such as skin conductance and cortisol [12] and new interaction analysis systems, such as sequence analysis and cue-responding [13][14][15][16][17][18]. There also appears to be an increasing interest in the role of the nurse-patient communication [19,20] and role delineation [21,22] as well as a renewed interest in decision-making [23], breaking bad news [24,25], training effects [26][27][28] and somatization [29,30].…”